【24h】

To Beat or Not to Beat: Beat Gestures in Direction Giving

机译:击败或不击败:在方向击败手势

获取原文

摘要

Research on gesture generation for embodied conversational agents (ECA's) mostly focuses on gesture types such as pointing and iconic gestures, while ignoring another gesture type frequently used by human speakers: beat gestures. Analysis of a corpus of route descriptions showed that although annotators show very low agreement in applying a 'beat filter' aimed at identifying physical features of beat gestures, they are capable of reliably distinguishing beats from other gestures in a more intuitive manner. Beat gestures made up more than 30% of the gestures in our corpus, and they were sometimes used when expressing concepts for which other gesture types seemed a more obvious choice. Based on these findings we propose a simple, probabilistic model of beat production for ECA's. However, it is clear that more research is needed to determine why direction givers in some cases use beats when other gestures seem more appropriate, and vice versa.
机译:体现对话代理(ECA)的姿态生成研究主要集中在诸如指向和标志性手势的手势类型上,同时忽略了人类扬声器经常使用的另一个手势类型:击败手势。路线描述的分析表明,尽管注释器在应用“击败过滤器”时展示了旨在识别节拍手势的物理特征的达成低度,但它们能够以更直观的方式可靠地将节拍与其他手势区分开。击败手势占我们语料库中的姿势的30多个手势,有时在表达其他手势类型似乎更明显的选择时使用。基于这些调查结果,我们提出了一种简单,概率的ECA节拍生产模型。但是,很明显,需要更多的研究来确定为什么在某些情况下使用跳动,当其他手势似乎更合适时,反之亦然。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号