首页> 外文会议>International Water Conference >Patent Pitfalls: Why Calgon and Clearwater Patents Failed, and How to Avoid Similar Outcomes
【24h】

Patent Pitfalls: Why Calgon and Clearwater Patents Failed, and How to Avoid Similar Outcomes

机译:专利陷阱:为什么卡格隆和克利尔沃特专利失败,以及如何避免类似的结果

获取原文

摘要

A prior art reference can inherently disclose an invention and thus prevent a later claim for patent protection on the invention, and prior art created by the inventor himself can be used to deny rights to the inventor for an invention that is the same or similar to the inventor's own prior art. In these ways water treatment patents have recently been invalidated. In other developments, the U.S. Supreme Court increased the standard for unobviousness in 2007, and the decision has been used by lower courts and the PTO to more frequently deny patent claims. But more recently the standard has largely been restored to its pre-2007 state for unpredictable arts such as water treatment. This paper describes these developments and concludes with recommendations for an invention management program that can avoid patent pitfalls and maximize rights in technology.
机译:现有技术的参考文献可以本质地公开了一种发明,因此防止了对本发明的专利保护的后续要求,并且由发明人创建的现有技术可以用于拒绝对与其相同或相似的发明人的发明人的权利。发明人自己的现有技术。在这些方面,水处理专利最近无效。在其他发展中,美国最高法院在2007年增加了对不知情的标准,该决定已被较低的法院和PTO用于更常见的否认专利索赔。但最近,该标准在很大程度上已经恢复到2007年前的水处理艺术前2007年的国家。本文介绍了这些发展,并结束了本发明管理计划的建议,可以避免专利陷阱和最大化技术权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号