首页> 外文会议>American Society for Mass Spectrometry Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics >Comparison of Direct and Indirect Extraction Methods for Deep Metaproteomics of the Gut Microbiota
【24h】

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Extraction Methods for Deep Metaproteomics of the Gut Microbiota

机译:直接和间接提取方法对肠道微生物深度标准组织的直接和间接提取方法

获取原文

摘要

The goal of this study was to compare two different methods for extracting bacterial and human proteins from human fecal material. Generally the LC-MS raw spectra are cleaner from the differential method with less non-peptide interference. The raw spectra from the direct method tend to have more dominant peptide peaks arising from very abundant human proteins. The differential centrifugation method provides a deeper look into the bacterial community. From all 20 microbes included in the database search Bacteriodes was the most heavily impacted by the extraction type with almost twice the number of spectra from the differential method (Figure 6). Many bacterial species were not effected by the extraction method.
机译:本研究的目的是比较两种不同的方法从人粪便材料中提取细菌和人蛋白。通常,LC-MS原料光谱是从差分方法的差别擦拭干净,较少的非肽干扰。来自直接方法的原始光谱倾向于具有来自非常丰富的人类蛋白质产生的更优异的肽峰。差分离心方法提供了深入的观察细菌群落。从包含的所有20微生物中包括在数据库中,搜索菌群是由差分方法的差异数量的几乎两倍的提取类型受到最大的影响(图6)。许多细菌物种未被提取方法进行。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号