首页> 外文会议>American Society for Mass Spectrometry Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics >MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Based Identification of Clinically Important Microorganisms
【24h】

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Based Identification of Clinically Important Microorganisms

机译:马尔迪-TOF质谱基于临床重要微生物的鉴定

获取原文

摘要

Introduction:Identification of microorganisms in the clinical laboratory is based traditionally on morphology and biochemical characteristics. For many species, identification may take days so a rapid species-specific method would improve patient care. Nucleic-acid based assays are sensitive and accurate methods for species identification but are relatively slow and labor intensive. We evaluated MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the rapid identification of microorganisms using Bruker Daltonics MALDI BioTyper software and either an in-house generated spectral library of 121 yeast reference strains or the manufacturer's library consisting mainly of bacteria. We correctly identified 85percent of 117 yeast, 184 bacterial, and 47 blood isolates. The MALDI-TOF based method was found to be highly reproducible and accurate with low consumable cost and minimal preparation time. Methods: 105 yeast reference strains (8 genera, 40 species), 115 yeast clinical isolates (6 genera, 11 species), 319 bacterial clinical isolates (59 species), and 131 positive blood culture isolates (59 species) were assayed. A single colony from an agar culture plate or concentration of organisms from a positive blood culture broth was washed in ethanol, dissolved in formic acid and acetonitrile, and spotted 4 times on a steel target with saturated alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as the matrix. MALDI-TOF spectra were accumulated in positive mode from each sample across the 2000 to 20,000 m/z range on a Bruker UltraFlex TOF-TOF. The spectra were evaluated using the MALDI BioTyper software. Total time from colony to results was <30 minutes for a single isolate. Preliminary Data: Using the MALDI BioTyper software from Bruker Daltonics, a yeast library was developed using 115 clinically important reference strains. When multiple isolates of a species were available, we verified that all isolates had nearly identical spectra. When challenged with 115 known clinical isolates, 109 isolates (93percent) were correctly identified. Of the 6 discrepancies, 5 were identified correctly but scored below significance levels, three were identified correctly only at the genus level, and one did not give usable spectra. MALDI-TOF spectra of 319 bacterial clinical isolates spanning 59 species (including Gram positive and Gram negative organisms) were evaluated using the manufacturer supplied library. Identification was correct for 267 isolates (83percent). Twenty-nine isolates (9percent) were identified correctly but scored too low to justify identification at the species level. Ten isolates were not identified due to poor spectra and two organisms were not in the library. Thirteen isolates gave mixed or incorrect results. Of 131 positive blood cultures evaluated against the manufacturers library, 75 (57percent) were identified correctly using a score of >2.0 and 92 (70percent) were identified correctly using a score of >1.8. There were four samples that were shown by biochemical methods to be mixed cultures. In all four cases, the MALDI-TOF method successfully identified one organism but failed to identify the second organism. Three cultures gave incorrect identification at the species level. The remaining cultures failed to produce usable spectra, most likely due to either ion suppression by free hemoglobin or low organism count. Although 10percent of the 434 bacteria and yeast samples did not produce sufficiently detailed spectra to give acceptable scores for identification purposes, there were only thirteen false identifications (3percent). This combination of 97percent specificity and 86percent sensitivity compares favorably to current techniques but MALDITOF is considerably faster and cheaper, thus making MALDI-TOF identification of microorganisms a preferred method for the routine identification of microorganisms. Considerations for using this method as a primary method for organism identification in clinical samples will be discussed.
机译:介绍:临床实验室中微生物的鉴定是传统上基于形态和生化特征的。对于许多物种,鉴定可能需要数天,所以快速的物种特异性方法会改善患者护理。基于核酸的测定是物种鉴定的敏感和准确的方法,但相对缓慢和劳动密集型。我们评估了使用Bruker Daltonics Maldi Biotyper软件的微生物的快速鉴定Maldi-Tof Masspersry,以及121酵母参考菌株的内部产生的谱库或主要由细菌组成的制造商的图书馆。我们正确确定了117酵e,184个细菌和47个血液分离物的85%。发现基于MALDI-TOF的方法是高度可重复的,精确的具有低耗材成本和最小的准备时间。方法:105酵母参考菌株(8属,40种),115酵母临床分离株(6属,11种),319种细菌临床分离株(59种)和131个阳性血液培养分离株(59种)。从琼脂培养板或来自阳性血液培养肉汤的生物浓度的单个菌落在乙醇中洗涤,溶于甲酸和乙腈,并用饱和α-氰基-4-羟基氨基酸的钢靶察察出4次矩阵。 MALDI-TOF光谱在BRUKER Ultraflex TOF-TOF上的每种样品中累积在2000中的每个样品中。使用MALDI BIOTYPER软件评估光谱。单个分离物的菌落到结果的总时间为<30分钟。初步数据:使用Bruker Daltonics的Maldi Biotyper软件,使用115临床重要参考菌株开发了酵母图书馆。当可用物种的多个分离物时,我们核实所有隔离物都具有几乎相同的光谱。当用115个已知的临床分离株挑战时,正确鉴定了109个分离物(93分)。在6个差异中,正确鉴定了5个,但得分低于显着性水平,只有三个在属级别正确鉴定出来,一个人没有给予可用的光谱。使用制造商提供的图书馆评估319种跨越59种(包括克阳性和革兰阴性生物)的细菌临床分离株的Maldi-TOF光谱。 267个分离物(83percent)鉴定是正确的。正确鉴定了29分离物(9分离物),但得分太低,无法在物种水平上证明鉴定。由于差的光谱,没有鉴定十个分离物,并且在图书馆中没有两个生物。十三个分离株会产生混合或不正确的结果。在131个对制造商库中评价的阳性血液培养物使用> 2.0和92(70%)正确鉴定出75(57%),使用> 1.8的得分正确鉴定出来。通过生物化学方法显示出四种样品,以混合培养物。在所有四种情况下,MALDI-TOF方法成功地确定了一种生物,但未能识别第二种生物。三种培养物在物种水平上识别不正确。剩余的培养物未能产生可用的光谱,很可能是由于自由血红蛋白或低生物计数的离子抑制。虽然434个细菌和酵母样品的10%没有产生足够详细的光谱,以获得可接受的评分以进行鉴定目的,只有十三个错误识别(3%)。这种975°特异性和86平分敏感性的组合对目前的技术进行了比较,但是马尔德尿的比较速度更快,更便宜,从而使MALDI-TOF鉴定微生物的优选方法用于常规鉴定微生物的常规鉴定的方法。将讨论使用该方法作为临床样本中生物体鉴定的主要方法的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号