首页> 外文会议>International Pittsburgh Coal Conference >PERFORMANCE, COST AND EMISSIONS ANALYSIS OF COAL-TO-LIQUIDS PLANTS WITH DIFFERENT GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES, UNDER CARBON CONSTRAINTS
【24h】

PERFORMANCE, COST AND EMISSIONS ANALYSIS OF COAL-TO-LIQUIDS PLANTS WITH DIFFERENT GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES, UNDER CARBON CONSTRAINTS

机译:碳限制下不同气化技术煤对液体植物的性能,成本和排放分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Coal-to-liquids (CTL) processes generate synthetic liquid fuels like gasoline and diesel fuel from coal. The process involves gasification of coal to produce synthesis gas which is then catalytically converted into liquid fuels in a Fischer Tropsch (FT) reactor. A variety of gasification technologies (GE/Texaco, Shell, E-Gas) can be used to convert coal into syngas. Similarly, FT technologies can be classified into high temperature (HTFT) and low temperature (LTFT) reactors which produce different liquid fuels from syngas. One main concern of coal liquids, however, is the large emissions of carbon dioxide (CO_2) from the CTL process. These emissions can be mitigated using carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. Two configurations are possible for CTL plants. In a typical commercial CTL plant, the unconverted syngas from the FT reactor is recycled to the reactor to increase the productivity of the liquids. In this work, such plants are called 'liquids-only' plants. The unconverted syngas from the FT reactor, instead of being recycled, can be combusted in a gas turbine steam turbine combined cycle power plant to generate electricity, which can be sold to the grid to add another stream of revenue. Plants with such configuration are called 'poly-generation' plants here. Different combinations of these component technologies (gasification, FT ami CCS) and plant configurations (liquids-only or poly-generation) affect the performance, cost and emissions of a CTL plant. In this paper, CTL processes using different commercial gasification technologies (GE, E-GAS and Shell) are techno-economically evaluated. Effect of implementing CCS or carbon constraints that impose a price or cost on CO_2 emissions is also studied. To study these effects, a comprehensive techno-economic assessment model of liquids-only and poly-generation CTL plants, capable of incorporating CCS is developed. To illustrate this model, a CTL plant producing 50,000 barrels/day of liquid products is considered as a case study. Capital costs ($/barrel/day) and cost of liquid products ($/barrel) are presented for a combination of different component technologies and plant configurations, under carbon constraints.
机译:煤液(CTL)工艺产生汽油和柴油燃料等合成液体燃料。该方法涉及煤的气化,以产生合成气,然后在Fischer Tropsch(FT)反应器中催化转化成液体燃料。各种气化技术(Ge / Texaco,Shell,E-Gas)可用于将煤转化为合成气。类似地,FT技术可以分为高温(HTFT)和低温(LTFT)反应器,其从合成气产生不同的液体燃料。然而,煤液的一个主要关注点是来自CTL过程的二氧化碳(CO_2)的大量排放。可以使用碳捕获和封存(CCS)技术来缓解这些排放。 CTL工厂可以进行两种配置。在典型的商业CTL植物中,来自FT反应器的未转化的合成气被再循环到反应器中以增加液体的生产率。在这项工作中,这种植物被称为“唯一的液体”植物。来自FT反应器的未转换的合成气,代替被回收,可以在燃气轮机汽轮机组合电厂燃烧以产生电力,这可以销售给网格,以添加另一个收入流。具有这种配置的植物在这里称为“多代”植物。这些组件技术(气化,FT AMI CCS)和植物配置(仅限液体或多种)的不同组合影响了CTL植物的性能,成本和排放。在本文中,使用不同商业气化技术(GE,E-GAL和SHALL)的CTL过程是技术 - 经济评估的。还研究了实施CCS或碳限制的效果,以为CO_2排放的价格或成本进行。为研究这些效果,开发了一种能够掺入CCS的液体仅和多代CTL植物的综合技术经济评估模型。为了说明这种模型,将培养50,000桶/天液体产品的CTL植物作为案例研究。资本成本($ /桶/日)和液体产品($ /桶)的成本在碳限制下,不同组件技术和工厂配置的组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号