首页> 外文会议>World Congress on Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources >Investigation of Head Loss along Drip Emitter Channel by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
【24h】

Investigation of Head Loss along Drip Emitter Channel by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

机译:用计算流体动力学调查滴灌通道沿滴灌通道的头部损失

获取原文

摘要

It is difficult to investigate how to achieve biggest head loss of the drip emitter channel due to the channel's minor and complicated structure. Four types of Super Typhoon emitter with trapezoidal channel were selected out for the investigation of the head loss along the channel, and the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) method was applied to simulate the micro-field inside the channel. First, four different types of drip emitter and their channel models were modeled; then, three kinds of turbulent model provided by the commercial software Fluent 6.3 were used to get micro-field of channel, eight groups of working pressure named 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16mH20 were applied for the simulation; at last, the experiments between pressure and dischargewere conducted, and the pressure corresponding to the simulation were used. The simulation results showed that the emitter discharge of different turbulent model is 4%-14% bigger than that of the experimental results, the average discharge deviation ofk-co and RSM model is 5, 4.5 respectively, but the solving efficiency of the k-co model is obviously higher than that of the RSM model. The effect of working pressure on the distribution is evident when the water head is lower than 6mH_2O, and the head loss distribution will keep stable when the working pressure is higher than 6mH20 except that near the inlet and outlet area. This may because the water flow inside channel except the zone near inlet and outlet is full turbulence when the working pressureis higher than 6mH_2O.
机译:由于通道的次要和复杂的结构,难以调查如何实现滴灌发射极通道最大的头部损失。选择有四种类型的具有梯形通道的超大台风发射极,用于沿着通道进行对头部损耗进行调查,并且应用CFD(计算流体动力学)方法来模拟通道内的微场。首先,建模四种不同类型的滴注发射器及其渠道模型;然后,使用由商业软件流利的6.3提供的三种湍流模型用于获得频道的微场,应用于2,4,6,8,10,12,14,1620的8组工作压力,用于模拟;最后,使用压力和放电之间的实验,并使用对应于模拟的压力。仿真结果表明,不同湍流模型的发射极排放比实验结果的发射极放电为4%-14%,平均放电偏差分别为5,4.5,但求求效率CO模型明显高于RSM模型。当水头低于6MH_2O时,工作压力对分布的影响是明显的,并且当工作压力高于6MH20时,头部损耗分布将保持稳定,除了入口和出口区域附近。这可能是因为除入口和出口附近的区域之外的水流是完全湍流,当工作压力高于6MH_2O时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号