首页> 外文会议>American Association of Physical Anthropologists >Dental caries prevalence by sex inprehistory: magnitude and meaning
【24h】

Dental caries prevalence by sex inprehistory: magnitude and meaning

机译:龋齿龋病患病症:数量和意义

获取原文

摘要

The focus of this chapter is to determine if there is a significant relation-ship between sex and oral disease in human prehistory.1 The idea that dentalcaries prevalence may be etiologically complex and multifactorial in natureis not new (Mandel, 1979). Nevertheless, significant advances in understand-ing the mechanisms of cariogenesis continue (Featherstone, 1987, 2000), andthe epidemiological study of dental caries continues to broaden, embracinggeographically and culturally more diverse populations. Less widely appre-ciated is the frequently reported finding that females display worse dentalhealth than males, especially in epidemiological studies of living populations(Haugejorden, 1996). While some anthropologists are well aware of the ten-dency for women to exhibit worse dental health than men (Larsen,1998; Walkerand Hewlett, 1990), a systematic global survey of sex differences in dentalpathology in prehistory has not been conducted. The present meta-analysistested for a gender bias in oral health by gathering, critically evaluating, andstatistically summarizing data on sex differences in dental caries for a globalsample of early historic and prehistoric skeletal series.
机译:本章的重点是确定人类史中的性别和口腔疾病之间是否存在重要的关系.1牙齿患病率可能是病因繁荣的想法,无论是新的吗(Mandel,1979)。然而,了解龋齿发生机制的显着进展(Featherstone,1987,2000),牙科龋的流行病学研究继续扩大,拥抱地图和文化更多样化的人口。那么广泛appre-ciated被频繁报告发现,女性比显示男性更糟糕dentalhealth,尤其是在(Haugejorden,1996年)生活的人群的流行病学研究。虽然某些人类学家都知道妇女的十个患者,但牙科健康比男性更糟糕(Larsen,1998; Walkerand Hewlett,1990),尚未进行系统的全球全球性别差异调查牙科手术。通过收集,批判性地评估,安排牙科龋病的性别差异数据,对口腔健康的性别偏见进行性别偏见,为牙科龋的性别差异进行了性别偏见,为早期历史和史前骨骼系列进行了性别差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号