首页> 外文会议>Annual world conference of the Air Transport Research Society >A comparative study of airport connectivity in China, Europe and US: which network provides the best service to passengers?
【24h】

A comparative study of airport connectivity in China, Europe and US: which network provides the best service to passengers?

机译:中国,欧洲和美国机场连接的比较研究:哪个网络为乘客提供最佳服务?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper investigates the connectivity of the airport networks in China, Europe and US. Our aim is to analyze which network is most beneficial to final passengers in terms of travel time and which of the network features lead to such a result. The networks considered have different characteristics: the US airport network has been liberalized earlier and both the European and American network have recently seen a sharp increase in the number of point to point routes mainly due to low cost carriers, which overlap with the traditional airline networks. China has the least developed network in terms of number of airports and number of routes. A time-dependent minimum path approach is employed to calculate the minimum travel time between each pair of airports in the three networks, inclusive of flight times and waiting times in intermediate airports. We evaluate each fastest indirect connection in terms of circuitry times and routing factors to consider the effect of the hubs’ locations. Then we assess the temporal coordination of flights by calculating the average waiting times in intermediate airports. Our results show that fastest connections do not differ much in terms of routing factors and circuitry times. Even if the European network has the greater number of direct flights per airport, when connections require intermediate airports, their average waiting times exceed those of the American and Chinese Network.
机译:本文调查了中国,欧洲和我们的机场网络的连通性。我们的宗旨是在旅行时间方面分析哪个网络对最终乘客最有利于最终乘客,并且该网络功能导致了这种结果。认为网络具有不同的特点:美国机场网络早些时候被自由化,欧洲和美国网络最近看到了指向点路线的数量急剧增加,主要是由于低成本的运营商,与传统的航空公司网络重叠。中国在机场数量和路线数量方面拥有最少的网络。采用时间依赖的最小路径方法来计算三个网络中每对机场之间的最小旅行时间,包括中间机场的飞行时间和等待时间。我们在电路时间和路由因素方面评估每个最快的间接连接,以考虑集线器位置的效果。然后,我们通过计算中间机场的平均等待时间来评估航班的时间协调。我们的结果表明,在路由因素和电路时间方面,最快的连接并不不同。即使欧洲网络拥有每个机场的直飞航班,当连接需要中间机场时,他们的平均等待时间超过了美国和中国网络的平均等待时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号