首页> 外文会议>Annual world conference of the Air Transport Research Society >Competition between hub airports: the case of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
【24h】

Competition between hub airports: the case of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol

机译:枢纽机场之间的竞争:阿姆斯特丹机场史基浦机场的案例

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we present a methodology to analyze the competitive position of hub airports on markets served with a transfer at these airports, the so-called hub markets. This methodology results in the estimated passenger market shares of hub-airports on thousands of individual hub markets. The paper adds to the existing body of knowledge since earlier research mainly addressed the supply-side of airline network competition in terms of connectivity and generalized travel costs. In this paper, we add the demand side by modelling passenger choice behaviour in airline networks. We apply this methodology to the competitive position of Amsterdam Schiphol vis-à-vis competing hub airports. We conclude that the most important hub markets for Amsterdam are the markets between North-America and Europe, Asia/Pacific and Europe and the hub markets within Europe. At about 30% of the hub markets via Schiphol, SkyTeam and partners have a monopoly. The majority of these markets are very small with only a few passengers per day. At bigger, long-haul markets, the airport faces heavy competition from other hubs. The most important competitors of SkyTeam at Amsterdam are still the traditional two: Frankfurt (Star alliance) and Heathrow (Oneworld). Paris CDG frequently pops up as an important hub on markets also served by Amsterdam Schiphol. However, since the Paris and Amsterdam hubs belong to the same carrier Air France-KLM, this is rather network overlap than network competition. In the various geographical submarkets, also competitors arise besides Heathrow and Frankfurt. Between Europe and North America, Chicago (Oneworld/Star) arises besides Heathrow and Frankfurt whereas alliance hubs of Newark (Continental) and New York JFK (Delta) also play an important role. Between Europe and Asia, Munich, Dubai, Singapore and Helsinki pop up as competitors, whereas in the intra-European market the Star alliance competes with SkyTeam not only via Frankfurt but also via Munich and Copenhagen. Between Europe and Latin-America, Iberia at Madrid is the biggest competitor on hub markets served via Schiphol whereas Air France via Paris shows a large overlap with the Schiphol hub. The model presented here is in particular relevant for governments and airports that want to benchmark the competitive position of a hub airport accurately and go beyond the traditional ‘top ten' list of passenger numbers.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来分析枢纽机场对市场的竞争地位,在这些机场转移,所谓的集线器市场。这种方法导致估计的枢纽机场的乘客市场份额在成千上万的个别中心市场。本文增加了现有的知识体系,因为早期研究主要涉及航空公司网络竞争的供应方,在连通性和广义旅行成本方面。在本文中,我们通过在航空公司网络中建模乘客选择行为来增加需求方。我们将这种方法应用于阿姆斯特丹史基浦Vis-is竞争中心机场的竞争地位。我们得出结论,阿姆斯特丹最重要的枢纽市场是北美和欧洲,亚洲/太平洋和欧洲和欧洲内部市场之间的市场。通过史基浦,Skyteam和合作伙伴在大约30%的枢纽市场有垄断。这些市场的大多数是非常小的,每天只有几名乘客。在更大的长途市场,机场面临着其他枢纽的繁重竞争。 Amsterdam的Skyteam最重要的竞争对手仍然是传统的二:法兰克福(星联盟)和希思罗机场(OneWorld)。巴黎CDG经常弹出,作为Amsterdam Schiphol的市场上的一个重要枢纽。然而,由于巴黎和阿姆斯特丹集线器属于同一载波空气法国-KLM,这是网络重叠而不是网络竞争。在各种地理显示器中,除了希思罗机场和法兰克福,竞争对手也会出现竞争对手。欧洲与北美之间,芝加哥(Oneworld / Star)除了希思罗机场和法兰克福之外,纽瓦克(欧洲大陆)和纽约JFK(三角洲)也发挥着重要作用。欧洲和亚洲,慕尼黑,迪拜,新加坡和赫尔辛基突然出现在竞争对手,而在欧洲内部市场中,星际联盟不仅通过法兰克福和慕尼黑和哥本哈根竞争。欧洲和拉丁美洲之间,伊比利亚在马德里是通过史基浦服务的枢纽市场的最大竞争对手,而通过巴黎航空法国与史基浦枢纽的速度较大。这里展示的模型特别是希望准确地将枢纽机场竞争地位基准的政府和机场相关,并超越传统的“十大”乘客编号清单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号