首页> 外文会议>System Dynamics Society International Conference >How a System Backfires: From a Redundancy Solution to Redundancy Problems in Security
【24h】

How a System Backfires: From a Redundancy Solution to Redundancy Problems in Security

机译:系统逆行如何:从安全性解决方案中的冗余解决方案

获取原文

摘要

Increasing attention is being paid to reliability, safety, and security issues in social systems. Scott Sagan (2004) examined why more security forces (a redundancy solution) may produce less security (redundancy problems). In that paper, he discussed how the system could cause backfire in three major ways (i.e. "common mode error", "social shirking", and "overcompensation"). Using Sagan's hypotheses, I simulate and analyze a simplified and generic security system as more guards are added. Simulation results support two of the hypotheses, showing "common mode error" makes the system backfire, and "social shirking" creates inefficiency in the system as well as exacerbating the common mode error's effect. Simulation results show "overcompensation" has no effect on backfiring, but leads the system to a critical situation, in which it could easily be affected by "common mode error." The structure of the model and simulation results give some insights into developing appropriate security policies.
机译:越来越关注社会系统中的可靠性,安全性和安全问题。 Scott Sagan(2004)审查了为什么更多安全力量(冗余解决方案)可能会产生较少的安全性(冗余问题)。在那篇论文中,他讨论了系统如何以三种主要方式导致反馈(即“共同模式错误”,“社交流传”和“过度补偿”)。使用Sagan的假设,我模拟并分析了简化和通用的安全系统,因为添加了更多的警卫。仿真结果支持两个假设,显示“共模误差”使系统反射,“社交刷新”在系统中产生效率低下,并加剧共模误差的效果。仿真结果显示“过度补偿”对背击没有影响,但将系统引导至危急情况,其中它很容易受到“共模误差”的影响。模型和仿真结果的结构对开发适当的安全策略提供了一些见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号