首页> 外文会议>AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence >Solving Seven Open Problems of Offline and Online Control in Borda Elections
【24h】

Solving Seven Open Problems of Offline and Online Control in Borda Elections

机译:在波尔达选举中解决离线和在线控制的七个公开问题

获取原文

摘要

Standard (offline) control scenarios in elections (such as adding, deleting, or partitioning either voters or candidates) have been studied for many voting systems, natural and less natural ones, and the related control problems have been classified in terms of their complexity. However, for one of the most important natural voting systems, the Borda Count, only a few such complexity results are known. We reduce the number of missing cases by pinpointing the complexity of three control scenarios for Borda elections, including some that arguably are among the practically most relevant ones. We also study online candidate control, an interesting dynamical, partial-information model due to Hemaspaandra et al. (2012a), who mainly focused on general complexity bounds by constructing artificial voting systems - only recently they succeeded in classifying four problems of online candidate control for one natural voting system: sequential plurality (Hemaspaandra et al. 2016). We settle the complexity of another four natural cases: constructive and destructive online control by deleting and adding candidates in sequential Borda elections.
机译:已经研究了许多投票系统,自然和较少的自然的选举中的标准(例如添加,删除或划分选民或候选人)的控制方案(例如添加,删除或候选人),并且在复杂性方面已经对相关的控制问题进行了分类。然而,对于最重要的自然投票系统之一,BORDA计数,只知道一些这样的复杂性结果。我们通过针对波尔达选举的三种控制场景的复杂性来减少缺失病例的数量,包括有些可以说是实际上最相关的情景。我们还研究在线候选控制,由于Hemashaandra等人而引起的有趣的动态部分信息模型。 (2012A),其主要专注于通过构建人工投票系统的一般复杂性界限 - 最近,他们最近才能分类一个天然投票系统的在线候选控制的四个问题:顺序多(Hemashaandra等,2016)。我们解决了另外四种自然案例的复杂性:通过删除和加入顺序波尔达选举中的候选人来解决建设性和破坏性的在线控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号