首页> 外文会议>Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers >Comparison of pretreatment methods for wheat straw densification by life cycle assessment study
【24h】

Comparison of pretreatment methods for wheat straw densification by life cycle assessment study

机译:生命周期评估研究对小麦秸秆致密化预处理方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Compaction and pelletization methods increase biomass bulk density and energy density, making the bulk biomass easy to handle, transport and utilize. Abundant amounts of wheat straw biomass are produced every year in the world. This paper presents a life cycle analysis assessment (LCA) study to compare five different pretreatment methods during wheat straw pelletization. System boundary was defined from transporting wheat straw bale in the field to the pelletizing plant and pellets transported to thecustomer. Steam explosion treatment (SE), microwave alkaline treatment (MA), binder addition (BD), radiofrequency alkaline treatment (RF) and torrefaction (TF) have potential as pretreatment method prior to pelletization. A description for each pretreatment method in the pelletization system is presented in this paper. The Simapro software for L0A study incorporating Ecoinvent database and literature data was used to conduct this study. The environmental impact for each pretreatment method was evaluated. Global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, ozone layer depletion, abiotic depletion, fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity, photochemical oxidation, and terrestrial ecotoxidation were considered as environment impact indicators against which each pretreatment method for wheat straw pelletization was evaluated. The results revealed that binder addition especially involving the addition of wood waste has lower environmental impact compared to the control case (no treatment system option) and the other pretreatment options. Steam explosion (SE) and radiofrequency (RF) pretreatment methods had the more negative environmental impacts if these were to be adopted in wheat straw pelletization system compared to the control case and other options (MA, BD and TF).
机译:压实和造粒方法增加生物量堆积密度和能量密度,使散装生物质易于处理,运输和利用。每年在世界上生产丰富的小麦秸秆生物量。本文介绍了生命周期分析评估(LCA)研究,以比较小麦秸秆造粒期间的五种不同预处理方法。系统边界由在现场运输到造粒植物和输送到TheCustomer的颗粒中的颗粒秸秆捆。蒸汽爆炸处理(SE),微波碱性处理(MA),粘合剂添加(BD),射频碱性处理(RF)和烘焙(TF)在造粒之前具有预处理方法。本文提出了造粒系统中的每种预处理方法的描述。使用EcoInvent数据库和文献数据的L0A研究的Simapro软件用于进行这项研究。评估了对每种预处理方法的环境影响。全球变暖潜力,酸化,富营养化,人类毒性,海洋生态生态毒性,臭氧层耗尽,非生物耗尽,淡水水生生态毒性,光化学氧化和陆地生态氧化,被认为是对麦秸造粒的每种预处理方法进行评估的环境冲击指标。结果表明,与控制案例(无治疗系统选项)和其他预处理选择相比,粘合剂添加尤其涉及添加木材废物的环境影响较低。蒸汽爆炸(SE)和射频(RF)预处理方法是否在与控制箱和其他选择(MA,BD和TF)中的小麦秸秆造粒系统中采用了较为负的环境影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号