首页> 外文会议>ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics >Quantification of Anionic Surfactant in Brine by Using Solvent Extraction Followed by Spectrophotometry, Evaporative Light Scattering Detection, and Mass Spectrometry
【24h】

Quantification of Anionic Surfactant in Brine by Using Solvent Extraction Followed by Spectrophotometry, Evaporative Light Scattering Detection, and Mass Spectrometry

机译:用溶剂萃取,用分光光度法,蒸发光散射检测和质谱法定量盐水中的阴离子表面活性剂

获取原文

摘要

SEV: Method was easy, reproducible and cost-effective. However, it had a long analysis time and could not distinguish the surfactant from other compounds that can complex with ethyl violet. ELSD: Method was reproducible and can be automated. However, it had the worst detection limit and could not distinguish other compounds co-eluting with the surfactant. MS: Ionized compounds that could interfere with the surfactants for the SEV and ELSD methods can be distinguished from the analyte ions based on their different m/z-values. Method had the lowest detection limit but was way most expensive. The method needs to be improved to achieve a wider linear dynamic range and a higher correlation coefficient.
机译:SEV:方法简单,可重复且经济高效。然而,它具有很长的分析时间,不能将表面活性剂与其他可以与紫罗兰乙基乙基乙基络合的化合物区分开。 ELSD:方法是可重复的,可以自动化。然而,它具有最糟糕的检测限,不能区分与表面活性剂共洗脱的其他化合物。可以基于其不同的M / Z值与分析物离子区分,可以干扰SeV和ELSD方法的表面活性剂的电离化合物。方法具有最低的检测限,但最昂贵。需要改进该方法以实现更广泛的线性动态范围和更高的相关系数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号