首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management >GENERATION OF HUMAN RELIABILITY DATA FOR THE AIR TRAFFIC INDUSTRY
【24h】

GENERATION OF HUMAN RELIABILITY DATA FOR THE AIR TRAFFIC INDUSTRY

机译:为空中交通行业的人力可靠性数据

获取原文

摘要

Air Traffic Management (ATM) deals with the safe and efficient passage of aircraft across national and international airspace. In Europe, ATM, as with other industries, must now comply with formalized risk assessment procedures, for example those embodied in EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARR) 4 [1]. In order to demonstrate that systems are acceptably safe, a Safety Assessment Methodology (SAM) has been proposed by EUROCONTROL [2] and is being applied by many countries in Europe. Safety cases for existing or new systems, or significant system changes, can utilize fault and event tree (or equivalent) approaches to model and quantify risk as is done in other industries such as nuclear power, chemical, process, and petrochemical. However, there has been little emphasis to date on Human Reliability Assessment (HRA) in the world of ATM, although it is recognized that the high degree of safety evident in this industry is mainly due to the human element (in particular the air traffic controller). The context of this paper therefore concerns the feasibility of HRA in air traffic risk assessments. As a first step towards HRA in ATM, this paper focuses on the degree to which quantitative human error data can be generated to substantiate or calibrate an ATM HRA approach. Two separate exercises are reported. The first concerns collection of human error data from a real-time simulation involving air traffic controllers and pilots. This study focused on communication errors between controllers and pilots. The second relates to a formal expert judgment study using direct numerical estimation (also called Absolute Probability Judgment) and Paired Comparisons protocols to elicit and structure the controller and pilot expertise. The results showed that stable HEPs can be provided from real time simulations, at least with respect to communications activities, and to a lesser extent from expert judgment approaches. These results suggest that the approach of HRA can be adapted to ATM safety case methodologies and frameworks. An example of a recent developing air traffic safety case which has utilized the HRA approach is briefly discussed. The conclusion is that HRA is feasible, but that more data do need to be collected, since ATM dynamics and safety scenario timings, as well as its operational culture and performance shaping factors, are different to other industries where HRA application is 'the norm'.
机译:空中交通管理(ATM)涉及跨国和国际空域的安全有效的飞机通过。与其他行业一样,在欧洲,ATM必须符合正式风险评估程序,例如欧元信子安全监管要求(ESARR)4 [1]中所体现的那些。为了证明系统是可接受的安全性,欧元的技术提出了一种安全评估方法(SAM)[2]并正在欧洲许多国家应用。现有或新系统的安全案例或重大系统变化,可以利用故障和事件树(或等效)来模拟和量化风险,如核电,化学,工艺和石化等其他行业所做的那样。但是,尽管迄今为止认识到,迄今为止,迄今为止,迄今为止,迄今为止迄今为止,该行业的高度安全性主要是由于人类因素(特别是空中交通管制员) )。因此,本文的背景涉及HRA在空中交通风险评估中的可行性。作为朝向HRA在ATM中的第一步,本文侧重于可以生成定量人体错误数据的程度来证实或校准ATM HRA方法。报告了两个单独的练习。首先涉及从涉及空中交通管制员和飞行员的实时仿真收集人为错误数据。本研究专注于控制器和飞行员之间的通信错误。第二个涉及使用直接数值估计(也称为绝对概率判断)和配对比较协议的正式专家判断研究,以引发和构建控制器和飞行员专业知识。结果表明,至少关于通信活动,至少可以从实时模拟提供稳定的HEPS,以及从专家判断方法的较小程度上提供。这些结果表明,HRA的方法可以适应ATM安全案例和框架。简要讨论了已经利用HRA方法的最近开发空中交通安全壳的一个例子。结论是HRA是可行的,但需要收集更多的数据,因为ATM动态和安全情景时序以及其运营文化和性能塑造因素不同,与HRA应用是“常态”的其他行业不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号