首页> 外文会议>IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics >The role of erosion rate formulation on the ignition and subsidence of turbidity current
【24h】

The role of erosion rate formulation on the ignition and subsidence of turbidity current

机译:侵蚀率配方对浊度电流点火和沉降的作用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

An empirical relationship describing the entrainment of suspended sediment is required even if a vertical structure model is used for modeling turbidity currents. Several relationships can be found in the literature for estimating the entrainment rate of suspended sediment. Turbidity currents at laboratory scale are primarily depositional and the model prediction is not sensitive to the specified entrainment relationship. At the field scale however, turbidity currents are more likely to be erosional and the predicted results can be quite sensitive to the entrainment relations used in the model. Here, the four-equation model of turbidity current is utilized to revisit the ignition and subsiding conditions of turbidity currents originally described in the seminal work of Parker et al. (1986). Three different sediment entrainment models are considered. The ignition conditions are studied for a variety of parameters such as sediment size, slope and inflow current thickness. It has been found that steeper slopes and finer sediment gives lower values of ignition velocity and sediment concentration. The ignition Richardson number is found to be strongly dependent on the slope and insensitive to the sediment size. The ignition condition has been found to be quite sensitive to the entrainment relation used in the computation. The phase diagrams describing ignition conditions, and igniting and subsiding regions obtained from different erosion models are generally similar. The auto-suspension generation line dividing the zones of ignition and subsidence are found to be different for different entrainment relationship. As a result, a turbidity current predicted to be subsiding by one entrainment relation could turn out to be igniting when a different entrainment model is used. This has important implication in the modeling of turbidity current as the same numerical model can give completely different prediction depending on which entrainment relation is used.
机译:即使垂直结构模型用于造型浊度电流,也需要描述悬浮沉积物夹带的经验关系。在文献中可以找到几种关系,用于估计悬浮沉积物的夹带速率。实验室规模处的浊度主要是沉积的,模型预测对指定的夹带关系不敏感。然而,在现场规模中,浊度电流更可能是侵蚀性的,并且预测结果对模型中使用的夹带关系非常敏感。这里,利用浊度电流的四个方程模型来重新求解帕克等人的精彩作品最初描述的浊度电流的点火和沉降条件。 (1986)。考虑了三种不同的沉积物夹带模型。对各种参数进行了点火条件,例如沉积物尺寸,坡度和流入电流厚度。已经发现,陡峭的斜坡和更精细的沉积物使较低的点火速度和沉积物浓度的值较低。发现点火Richardson号码被认为强烈依赖于坡度并对沉积物大小不调。已发现点火条件对计算中使用的夹带关系非常敏感。描述从不同侵蚀模型获得的点火条件和点火和偏离区域的相图通常是相似的。发现划分点火区域和沉降区的自动悬架生成线对于不同的夹带关系是不同的。结果,当使用不同的夹带模型时,预测被预测的浊度电流预测被拾取的凸起关系可能会点火。这在浊度电流的建模中具有重要意义,因为相同的数值模型可以完全不同的预测,这取决于使用夹带关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号