首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports >THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUSCLE FORCES AND EMG PARAMETERS IN TWO FORMS OF THE STRENGTH TRAINING
【24h】

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUSCLE FORCES AND EMG PARAMETERS IN TWO FORMS OF THE STRENGTH TRAINING

机译:两种力量训练中肌力和肌电参数的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Based on the facts that we can conclude: 1) There were no significant differences of the force parameters between "continuous repetition MVC" and "interval repetition MVC" in the static condition, but very significant differences in dynamic condition (p < 0.01). Thus the dynamic training form of "continuous repetition MVC" is preferable to that of "interval repetition MVC" in improving the start strength, and vice versa in improving the maximal strength and the explosive strength. 2) Despite of the difference of conditions tested, any individual's muscles were activated in similar orders corresponding to the forms of "continuous repetition MVC" and "interval repetition MVC", but even in same form of action a significant person-to-person difference was found in the muscular patterns. 3) Comparing "continuous repetition MVC" with "interval repetition MVC", there was no significant difference in the myoelectric activity level of the muscles on a whole in static condition, but a significant difference in dynamic condition (p < 0.05). The myoelectric activity level of the muscles during "interval repetition MVC" was far lower than that during "continuous repetition MVC". 4) On both forms of "continuous repetition MVC" and "interval repetition MVC", the correlation degree of EMG-force is almost medium to low. Considering all the factors that may disturb the myoelectric changes, it is not adoptable and also not scientific that the muscular force was statistically predicted from EMG parameters at present.
机译:基于我们可以得出结论的事实:1)在静态条件下“连续重复MVC”和“间隔重复MVC”之间的力参数没有显着差异,但动态条件的差异非常显着(P <0.01)。因此,“连续重复MVC”的动态训练形式优选为“间隔重复MVC”改善起始强度,反之亦然,改善最大强度和爆炸强度。 2)尽管经过测试的条件差异,但在与“连续重复MVC”形式和“间隔​​重复MVC”的形式相对应的类似订单中激活了任何个体的肌肉,但即使以相同的作用形式为重要人物差异发现在肌肉模式中。 3)将“连续重复MVC”与“间隔重复MVC”进行比较,在静态条件下整体肌电活性水平没有显着差异,但动态条件的显着差异(P <0.05)。在“间隔重复MVC”期间肌肉的肌电活动水平远低于“连续重复MVC”期间的肌肉。 4)在两种形式的“连续重复MVC”和“间隔重复MVC”上,EMG-Force的相关程度几乎是较低的。考虑到可能扰乱肌电变化的所有因素,它不可采用,并且在目前从EMG参数统计上预测肌肉力量也不是科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号