首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate >COMPARISON OF TWO INDOOR CO MONITORING METHODS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF TWO INDOOR CO MONITORING METHODS

机译:两个室内CO监测方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

A comparative study of two indoor Carbon Monoxide (CO) monitoring methods, electrochemistry and Non-Dispersive Infra-Red (NDIR), was conducted with constant temperature and relative humidity. CO data Logger, an electrochemical monitor and a certain type of NDIR CO Analyzer was selected to measure indoor COconcentration. Statistical methods such as linear regression, statistical correlation, and paired-samples t-test were used to analyze the CO data by the two monitoring methods. The results showed that the data obtained by two kinds of monitors had a strong correlation, but the difference was significant. After correcting the electrochemical CO data by the correction coefficient 0.77, and then conducting paired-samples t-test to compare with NDIR data,the result showed that two types of data had no significant difference. So it is feasible to utilize the simple and convenient electrochemical CO data Logger instead of the complex NDIR CO Analyzer with constant temperature and humidity for monitoring remote rural area indoor CO.
机译:用恒定温度和相对湿度进行两种室内一氧化碳(CO)监测方法,电化学和非分散红外线(NDIR)的对比研究。 CO数据记录器,选择电化学监视器和某种类型的NDIR CO分析仪以测量室内椰子浓缩。统计方法如线性回归,统计相关和配对样品T检验用于通过两种监测方法分析CO数据。结果表明,通过两种监视器获得的数据具有很强的相关性,但差异是显着的。在校正系数0.77校正电化学CO数据之后,然后进行配对样本T检验以与NDIR数据进行比较,结果表明,两种类型的数据没有显着差异。因此,利用简单方便的电化学CO数据记录器而不是具有恒温和湿度的复杂NDIR CO分析仪来监测远程农村地区的湿度是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号