首页> 外文会议>Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum >The Philosophy of Information Retrieval Evaluation
【24h】

The Philosophy of Information Retrieval Evaluation

机译:信息检索评估的哲学

获取原文

摘要

Evaluation conferences such as TREC, CLEF, and NTCIR are modern examples of the Cranfield evaluation paradigm. In Cranfield, researchers perform experiments on test collections to compare the relative effectiveness of different retrieval approaches. The test collections allow the researchers to control the effects of different system parameters, increasing the power and decreasing the cost of retrieval experiments as compared to user-based evaluations. This paper reviews the fundamental assumptions and appropriate uses of the Cranfield paradigm, especially as they apply in the context of the evaluation conferences.
机译:评估会议如TREC,CLEF和NTCIR是Cranfield评估范例的现代示例。在Cranfield,研究人员对测试收集进行实验,以比较不同检索方法的相对有效性。测试集团允许研究人员控制不同系统参数的影响,与基于用户的评估相比,增加功率并降低检索实验的成本。本文审查了克兰菲尔德范式的根本假设和适当用途,特别是在评估会议的背景下适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号