首页> 外文会议>Computers in Cardiology >Comparison of atrial rhythm extraction techniques for the estimation of the main atrial frequency from the 12-lead electrocardiogram in atrial fibrillation
【24h】

Comparison of atrial rhythm extraction techniques for the estimation of the main atrial frequency from the 12-lead electrocardiogram in atrial fibrillation

机译:心房颤动中12铅心心电图估算中心房节律提取技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

One of the greatest challenges in analysis of the atrial rhythm from the ECG is to distinguish the atrial component from the large ventricular components. Our aim was to compare three techniques of atrial rhythm extraction from three groups working on this problem. 12-lead ECG data from 7 patients in atrial fibrillation were analysed. For extraction of the atrial rhythm, spatiotemporal QRST cancellation was performed by the Lund group, blind source separation by the Valencia group, and principal component analysis by the Newcastle group. Peak atrial frequency was determined by Fourier transform of the signal with the largest atrial activity. All algorithms were successful in distinguishing the atrial rhythm from the low frequency ventricular rhythm. The mean (range) atrial frequency was 6.5 (5.9 - 7.6) Hz (Lund), 6.7(5.7 - 7.9) Hz (Valencia) and 6.5 (5.9 - &2) Hz (Newcastle). There were no significant differences between the atrial frequencies estimated by each of the techniques.
机译:分析来自ECG的心房节奏的最大挑战是将心房组分与大型心室成分区分开来。我们的目的是比较三个群体上的心房节奏提取的三种技术。分析了来自7例心房颤动的12例患者的12-铅ECG数据。为了提取心房节律,隆隆群,缬草组织的盲源分离和纽卡斯尔集团的主要成分分析进行了时尚QRST取消。峰心房频率由具有最大心房活动的信号的傅里叶变换确定。所有算法都成功地将心房节奏与低频心室节律区分开。平均(范围)心房频率为6.5(5.9 - 7.6)Hz(Lund),6.7(5.7 - 7.9)Hz(瓦伦西亚)和6.5(5.9 - &2)Hz(纽卡斯尔)。每个技术估计的心房频率之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号