首页> 外文会议> >Comparison of atrial rhythm extraction techniques for the estimation of the main atrial frequency from the 12-lead electrocardiogram in atrial fibrillation
【24h】

Comparison of atrial rhythm extraction techniques for the estimation of the main atrial frequency from the 12-lead electrocardiogram in atrial fibrillation

机译:比较心律提取技术从心房纤颤的12导联心电图估算主要心律频率

获取原文

摘要

One of the greatest challenges in analysis of the atrial rhythm from the ECG is to distinguish the atrial component from the large ventricular components. Our aim was to compare three techniques of atrial rhythm extraction from three groups working on this problem. 12-lead ECG data from 7 patients in atrial fibrillation were analysed. For extraction of the atrial rhythm, spatiotemporal QRST cancellation was performed by the Lund group, blind source separation by the Valencia group, and principal component analysis by the Newcastle group. Peak atrial frequency was determined by Fourier transform of the signal with the largest atrial activity. All algorithms were successful in distinguishing the atrial rhythm from the low frequency ventricular rhythm. The mean (range) atrial frequency was 6.5 (5.9 7.6) Hz (Lund), 6.7 (5.7 - 7.9) Hz (Valencia) and 6.5 (5.9 - 8.2) Hz (Newcastle). There were no significant differences between the atrial frequencies estimated by each of the techniques.
机译:从心电图分析心律方面的最大挑战之一是将心房成分与大型心室成分区分开。我们的目的是比较研究此问题的三组心律的三种提取方法。分析了7例房颤患者的12导联心电图数据。为了提取心律,Lund组取消了时空QRST,Valencia组进行了盲源分离,Newcastle组进行了主成分分析。通过最大心房活动信号的傅里叶变换确定心房峰值频率。所有算法均能成功地区分心律和低频心律。平均心房频率为6.5(5.9 7.6)Hz(隆德),6.7(5.7-7.9)Hz(巴伦西亚)和6.5(5.9-8.2)Hz(纽卡斯尔)。每种技术估算的心房频率之间无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号