首页> 外文会议>World Congress on Fertility and Sterility >Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility
【24h】

Evidence-based reproductive surgery: tubal infertility

机译:基于循证生殖手术:输卵管不孕

获取原文

摘要

The goal foi any infertile couple is to explore all reasonable attempts to achieve pregnancy The couple with infertility resulting from tubal disease has two therapeutic options to achieve this goal: reconstructive tubal surgery and in vitro fertilization. However, the increasing demand for new techniques of assisted reproduction has called into question the value of the more established methods of treatment for tubal infertility There are some causes of tubal infertility for which surgery has virtually no chance of success. For these situations, in vitro fertilization is clearly the only therapeutic option For other situations, the decision-making process requires detailed discussion on the effectiveness, adverse effects and cost of the procedures Endoscopic evaluation of the tubal mucosa is essential for the selective application of tubal surgery The available evidence shows that tubal surgery can be as, or more, effective as in vitro fertilization for cases of filmy adhesions, mild distal tubal occlusion and proximal obstruction It may, however, be reasonable to discuss in vitro fertilization with any couple without pregnancy 12 months after tubal surgery. In women with moderate to severe distal tubal disease, the diminishing success rates from surgery suggest that in vitro fertilization should be considered as the first line of treatment In the case of unsuccessful reconstructive surgery, or if a hydrosalpinx is irreparably damaged, a salpingectomy prior to in vitro fertilization has to be considered Tubal surgery has indisputable benefits for the patient if infertility is cured by the intervention A successful tubal repair gives the patient the possibility of conceiving more than once without further treatment It also gives the couple the psychological advantage of being able to conceive spontaneously Probably the most pragmatic viewpoint is to consider reproductive surgery and in vitro fertilization as complementary options that are directed towards increasing the overall probability of achieving a pregnancy in the most efficient manner.
机译:目标FOI任何不育的夫妇是探索患有妊娠的所有合理尝试,对输卵管疾病导致的夫妇具有两种治疗方法,可以实现这一目标:重建输卵管手术和体外施肥。然而,对辅助再生技术的新技术的需求越来越多地调查了管材不孕症的更熟悉的治疗方法的价值存在一些导管不孕症的原因,手术几乎没有成功的机会。对于这些情况,体外施肥显然是其他情况的唯一治疗选择,决策过程需要详细讨论管道粘膜的内窥镜评价的有效性,不利影响和成本对输卵管的选择性应用是必不可少的手术的可用证据表明,由于对薄膜粘连病例的体外施肥,轻度远端输卵管闭塞和近端梗阻的体外施肥可以合理地讨论任何没有怀孕的体外施肥,那么或更多输卵管手术后12个月。在中度至严重远端输卵管疾病的女性中,手术的成功率递减表明,在重建手术不成功的情况下,在体外施肥应被视为第一线治疗,或者如果湿润的是不可挽回的损坏,则在体外施肥必须被认为输卵管手术对患者产生无可争辩的益处,如果不孕症是通过干预的胁迫治愈的成功输卵管修复使患者能够在没有进一步的治疗的情况下构建不止一次的疗程,它也给夫妇提供了能力的心理优势自发地设想最务实的观点是考虑生殖手术和体外施肥作为互补选项,这些选项是以最有效的方式增加达到怀孕的总体概率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号