首页> 外文会议>Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference >Comparison of Permeability Estimation Models Through Bayesian Model Averaging and LASSO Regression
【24h】

Comparison of Permeability Estimation Models Through Bayesian Model Averaging and LASSO Regression

机译:通过贝叶斯模型平均和套索回归比较渗透率估计模型的比较

获取原文

摘要

To capture the most realistic reservoir description in terms of heterogeneity, it is essential to find out the most accurate approach for formation permeability estimation in non-cored intervals. The simplest and most common approach of data modeling is multiple linear regression that adopts stepwise elimination for model variables selection. However, that elimination has shown its weakness to efficiently handle the high number of predictors in a physical process. In this research, we adopt two modern statistical leaning algorithms for core permeability modeling given well log attributes and prediction in non-cored intervals of a sandstone formation. The Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) was adopted as a stochastic approach of data modeling and parameter selection in formation permeability modeling. Based on Bayes' theorem, BMA integrates prior distribution given the observed data in order to produce a posterior distribution of how likely the model is assimilating the data. In the computed BMA Occam's window, the best selected model has maximum posterior probability and minimum BIC; meanwhile, the non-influential predictors are eliminated when the probability of a nonzero predictor coefficient is less than 50% for the best sampled model. Conversely, the same procedure was done through the LASSO regression that considers penalized least squared equation for data modeling and non-influential factors removal. Results of the two algorithms were illustrated, discussed, and depicted for efficiency comparison in terms of their modeling and prediction accuracy. In addition, the two models were statistically validated based on observed-predicted response matching. Both BMA and LASSO have led to very accurate modeling and excellent matching between the observed and predicted core permeability. The adjusted R-squared and root mean squared error are highly encouraging with slight preferrnece of LASSO on BMA. The novelty of Bayesian Model Averaging comes from its stochastic design to generate multiple models taking into account the data uncertainty which leads to finding find the optimal fit between core permeability and well log attributes. Also, the LASSO regression has led to better results than BMA with the same observed-predicted response matching. Both of them have overcome the multicollinearity between two pairs of predictors. Consequently, BMA and LASSO are efficient approaches for multisource permeability modeling with high dimensional predictors.
机译:为了在异质性方面捕获最逼真的储层描述,必须找出非核心间隔中形成渗透率估计的最准确的方法。最简单和最常见的数据建模方法是多个线性回归,其采用逐步消除模型变量选择。然而,消除已经显示出其弱点,以有效地处理物理过程中的大量预测器。在这项研究中,我们采用了两个现代统计倾斜算法,用于核心渗透性建模,给出了砂岩形成的非芯间隔的井对数属性和预测。贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)被采用作为地层渗透性建模中的数据建模和参数选择的随机方法。基于贝叶斯定理,BMA在给定观察到的数据的情况下集成了先前分布,以便产生模型同化数据的可能性的后部分布。在计算的BMA occam的窗口中,最佳选择模型具有最大的后验概率和最小BIC;同时,当非零预测器系数的概率小于50%的最佳采样模型时,消除了非影响力预测器。相反,通过卢索回归来完成相同的程序,以追溯到数据建模和非影响因素的惩罚最小二乘方程和删除的非影响因素。在其建模和预测准确性方面说明了两种算法的结果,并描绘了效率比较。此外,基于观察预测的响应匹配,这两个模型进行了统计验证。 BMA和套索都导致了观察和预测的核心渗透率之间非常精确的建模和优异的匹配。调整后的R角和均方方误差高度令人鼓舞,在BMA上的套索轻微优选。贝叶斯模型平均的新颖性来自其随机设计,以产生多种模型,同时考虑到数据不确定性,导致查找核心渗透性和井日志属性之间的最佳拟合。此外,套索回归导致比BMA具有相同观察预测的响应匹配的比BMA更好。它们都克服了两对预测器之间的多色性。因此,BMA和套索是利用高维预测因子的多源渗透性建模的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号