首页> 外文会议>Mexican International Conference on Artificialntelligence >Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Import/Export Services within Ontology Platforms
【24h】

Evaluation of RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Import/Export Services within Ontology Platforms

机译:评估本体平台内的RDF和DAML +石油进出口服务

获取原文

摘要

Both ontology content and ontology building tools evaluations play an important role before using ontologies in Semantic Web applications. In this paper we try to assess ontology evaluation functionalities of the following ontology platforms: OilEd, OntoEdit, Protege-2000, and WebODE. The goal of this paper is to analyze whether such ontology platforms prevent the ontologist from making knowledge representation mistakes in concept taxonomies during RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontology import, during ontology building and during ontology export to RDF(S) and DAML+OIL. Our study reveals that most of these ontology platforms only detect a few mistakes in concept taxonomies when importing RDF(S) and DAML+OIL ontologies. It also reveals that most of these ontology platforms only detect some mistakes in concept taxonomies during building ontologies. Our study also reveals that these platforms do not detect any taxonomic mistake when exporting ontologies to such languages.
机译:本体内容和本体构建工具评估既在使用语义Web应用中使用本体之前发挥着重要作用。在本文中,我们尝试评估以下本体平台的本体评估功能:上油,进出口,Protege-2000和Webode。本文的目标是分析此类本体平台是否防止受极学家在RDF(S)和Daml +油本体导入期间在本体建设期间以及本体出口到RDF(S)和Daml +期间在概念分类中犯错误。油。我们的研究表明,这些本体平台的大多数人只检测进口RDF和Daml +油病时概念分类中的几个错误。它还揭示了大多数本体平台仅在构建本体期间检测概念分类学中的一些错误。我们的研究还揭示了这些平台在将本体出口到此类语言时不会检测到任何分类学错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号