首页> 外文会议>Annual Conference of the New Zealand Plant Protection Conference >COMPARISON OF TRAP-CATCH AND BAIT INTERFERENCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POSSUM DENSITIES
【24h】

COMPARISON OF TRAP-CATCH AND BAIT INTERFERENCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POSSUM DENSITIES

机译:陷阱捕获和诱饵干扰方法的比较估算负极密度

获取原文

摘要

Leg-hold trapping is a standard method for estimating possum population densities in New Zealand. However, the method is costly because traps are heavy and bulky and by law are required to be checked daily. This limits the number of sampling lines that can be used, which reduces precision. Traps also threaten rare native ground-birds. We evaluated two lightweight alternatives that are more cost-effective to use, orange quarters and WaxTags~(R). WaxTags~(R) are wax-blocks on a plastic tag and are marketed specifically for possum and rat population monitoring. Results showed that both the orange quarters and WaxTags~(R) were more effective for indicating the presence of possums than leg-hold traps. WaxTags~(R) were considered the better of the two alternatives because they did not attract more possums through time which can confound density estimates. Observers also indicated that possum bite-marks were easier to identify on the WaxTags~(R) than orange quarters.
机译:腿保持诱捕是一种估算新西兰群体密度的标准方法。然而,该方法昂贵,因为每天需要陷阱沉重和笨重,并且依法需要核实。这限制了可以使用的采样线的数量,这减少了精度。陷阱也威胁着稀有的土着鸟类。我们评估了两种轻量级替代方案,这些替代方案更具成本效益,橙色季度和蜡像〜(r)。蜡像〜(r)是塑料标签上的蜡块,专门用于负鼠和大鼠人口监测。结果表明,橙区和蜡状〜(R)〜(r)更有效地表明存在比腿持有陷阱的存在。蜡像〜(r)被认为是两种替代方案的更好,因为它们没有吸引更多的负载量,这可以通过时间混淆密度估计。观察者还表明,POSTUM BITE标记更容易识别蜡质〜(r)而不是橙色季度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号