首页> 外文会议>International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles >RECONSIDERATION OF INJURY CRITERIA FOR PEDESTRIAN SUBSYSTEM LEGFORM TEST - PROBLEMS OF RIGID LEGFORM IMPACTOR
【24h】

RECONSIDERATION OF INJURY CRITERIA FOR PEDESTRIAN SUBSYSTEM LEGFORM TEST - PROBLEMS OF RIGID LEGFORM IMPACTOR

机译:对刚性宽缘冲击力的行人子系统长格测试伤害标准的重新思考

获取原文

摘要

The legform impactor proposed by EEVC/WG17 [1] is composed of a rigid thigh segment and a rigid lower leg segment. Human bone, however, has flexibility, causing some differences between the EEVC rigid legform impactor and the human leg. This research analyzes the influence of the differences (rigid versus flexible) on the injury criteria. It also reanalyzes the upper tibia acceleration with regard to the fracture index. The rigid legform impactor cannot simulate bone bending motion, so the injury criteria should consider the legform rigidity. It means the injury criteria need to include the bone bending effect. From several PMHS test results, the shearing displacement becomes 23 mm and 20 degrees for bending angle including the bone bending effect. However, the bone bending effect will change with the loading conditions. Therefore, to establish a certain injury criteria for a rigid legform impactor is impossible. To solve this problem, a flexible legform impactor seems to be needed. If a flexible legform impactor exists, the relationship between rigid bone and flexible bone need not be considered, and the pure ligament tolerance can be applied. The threshold of upper tibia acceleration as for lower leg fracture (fibula/tibia/tibia+fibula fracture) was found to be 198G for 50% injury risk, but if we focus on the tibia fracture (tibia/tibia+fibula fracture), exclude the fibula-only fracture cases, the threshold becomes 247 G. By the way, to use only the upper tibia acceleration as the leg fracture index is a problem. The relationship between upper tibia acceleration and fracture was obtained from a PMHS test series which were conducted normal bumper height, but if the impact point is changed, the upper tibia acceleration becomes lower but the leg fracture occurs. Therefore, if the acceleration use for the leg fracture index, the accelerometer should be attached proper position. More the worse, the tibia acceleration from the rigid impactor is completely different from human leg because of its rigidity. Therefore, the acceleration from a rigid legform impactor should not be used for the estimation. If the legform impactor is flexible, the acceleration becomes proper, and can be made proper estimation. Finally, a flexible legform impactor seems to be needed for proper estimation of leg injury.
机译:EEVC / WG17 [1]提出的Legform撞击器由刚性大腿段和刚性下腿段组成。然而,人体骨骼具有灵活性,导致EEVC刚性短格式撞击器和人腿之间的一些差异。本研究分析了差异(刚性与柔性)对伤害标准的影响。它还在裂缝指数方面重新分析了上部胫骨加速度。刚性的legform撞击器不能模拟骨骼弯曲运动,因此伤害标准应考虑长格刚性。这意味着伤害标准需要包括骨弯曲效果。从几个PMHS测试结果,剪切位移变为23mm,20度,用于弯曲角度,包括骨弯曲效果。然而,骨弯曲效果将随装载条件而改变。因此,为了建立一定的刚性狭窄撞击法的伤害标准是不可能的。为了解决这个问题,似乎需要一个灵活的legform撞击器。如果存在灵活的legform撞击器,则不需要考虑刚性骨和柔性骨之间的关系,并且可以应用纯韧带耐受性。上胫骨加速的阈值(腓骨/胫骨/胫骨+腓骨骨折)被发现为198克,伤害风险50%,但如果我们专注于胫骨骨折(胫骨/胫骨+腓骨骨折),则排除仅腓骨骨折案例,阈值变为247克。顺便说一下,仅使用上胫骨加速,因为腿部骨折指数是一个问题。上胫骨加速度与断裂之间的关系从PMHS测试系列获得,该PMHS测试系列进行正常保险杠高度,但是如果发生冲击点,则上胫骨加速度变低,但腿部骨折发生。因此,如果对腿部断裂指数的加速度使用,则加速度计应附加适当的位置。更糟糕的是,由于其刚性,胫骨从刚性冲击器加速与人腿完全不同。因此,不应使用刚性格术冲击器的加速度来估计。如果Legform撞击器是灵活的,则加速度变得适当,并且可以正确估计。最后,正确估计腿部损伤似乎需要灵活的长格冲击器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号