首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Composite Materials >COMPARISON BETWEEN TRC AND CFRP AS EXTERNAL REINFORCEMENT FOR PLAIN CONCRETE BEAMS
【24h】

COMPARISON BETWEEN TRC AND CFRP AS EXTERNAL REINFORCEMENT FOR PLAIN CONCRETE BEAMS

机译:TRC和CFRP与普通混凝土梁外部钢筋的比较

获取原文

摘要

Strengthening and repairing existing structures is often more economical and sustainable than demolishing and afterwards rebuilding them. Concrete structures can be strengthened using high performance glass fibre Textile Reinforced Cements (TRC) as an external reinforcement. Until now no evaluation of the cracking behaviour of this system with respect to the established technique of CFRP strips is reported. This paper presents the experimental comparison between both techniques, based on four point bending tests with third point loading, where the crack pattern evolution is monitored with Digital Image Correlation (DIC). A wider TRC external reinforcement retrains the high initial stiffness up to a higher load and reduces the crack widths in comparison with the CFRP solution, designed to meet an equal failure load. These advantages can be attributed to the crack bridging capacity of the external reinforcement.
机译:加强和修复现有结构往往比拆迁更具经济且可持续性,之后重建它们。使用高性能玻璃纤维纺织品加强水泥(TRC)作为外部加固的混凝土结构。据报道,直到现在,报告了对该系统的裂缝行为的评估据报道。本文介绍了两种技术之间的实验比较,基于具有第三点加载的四点弯曲试验,其中通过数字图像相关(DIC)监测裂缝图案演进。更宽的TRC外部加强件将高初始刚度升高到更高的负载,并与CFRP溶液相比,设计用于满足相同的故障负载的裂缝宽度。这些优点归因于外部加强件的裂缝桥接能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号