首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing >Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in Maintenance and Diagnostics
【24h】

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in Maintenance and Diagnostics

机译:维护与诊断中的失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)

获取原文

摘要

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a tool that has long been used at various stages of the product life cycle but is most commonly used in the engineering design and manufacturing planning stages. Some work has been done on conceptual design stages but very little, if any, research has been conducted to understand how FMEA might be used during the service of the product. Furthermore, the feedback of performance knowledge (in the form of FMEA data) from the in-service product use to conceptual and engineering design is a potentially valuable but un-exploited activity. This can be seen as a possible method of implementing Design for Service. Diagnostic service tools (manuals, computer diagnostics, etc) are usually created as a post-production activity, but reuse of FMEA knowledge generated during design could be used in a concurrent activity. Additional benefits are gained from improved accuracy of the FMEA and the maintenance of up-to-date product knowledge. A system for computerised interactive FMEA generation from FMEA elements has been created from the research. An object-oriented FMEA model has been adopted and expanded to generate the FMEA elements and diagnostic FMEA. The use of an object-oriented FMEA environment and FMEA object libraries promotes the reuse of existing information and has increased data availability for the diagnostic tool development. The Diagnostic Service Tool (DST) is an extended application from the automated FMEA generation. Existing failure mode data is used to determine further characteristics of parts failure. As a result, a tool in the form of diagnostic software is created which is practical for real life use. The prototype software was evaluated in afield service application using four automatic transmission problem cases. The results showed that there was significant difference in repair times between the conventional repair manuals and DST. The research has demonstrated that the prototype software is successful in providing effective field service centered tools to the Field Service and in turn a method of providing feedback to the Designer. Hence, knowledge sharing between Engineering and Field Service can be carried out continuously to provide a significant improvement in product development.
机译:失效模式和效果分析(FMEA)是一种长期以来在产品生命周期的各个阶段使用的工具,但最常用于工程设计和制造规划阶段。一些工作已经在概念设计阶段完成,但很少,如果有的话,已经进行了研究以了解产品在产品服务期间如何使用FMEA。此外,从概念和工程设计的维修产品使用的性能知识(以FMEA数据形式)的反馈是一个潜在有价值但未开发的活动。这可以被视为实现服务设计的可能方法。诊断服务工具(手册,计算机诊断等)通常被创建为后期后期活动,但在设计期间生成的FMEA知识的重用可以用于并发活动。提高了FMEA的准确性和维护最新产品知识的额外福利。从研究中创建了来自FMEA元素的计算机化交互式FMEA系统系统。已经采用并扩展了面向对象的FMEA模型以产生FMEA元素和诊断FMEA。使用面向对象的FMEA环境和FMEA对象库促进了现有信息的重用,并增加了诊断工具开发的数据可用性。诊断服务工具(DST)是自动化FMEA生成的扩展应用程序。现有故障模式数据用于确定部件故障的其他特征。结果,创建了一种诊断软件形式的工具,这对于真实使用使用实用。使用四个自动传输问题案例在AFIELS服务应用中评估原型软件。结果表明,传统维修手册与DST之间的修复时间有显着差异。该研究表明,原型软件成功地为现场服务提供了有效的现场服务中心工具,并反过来提供给设计者提供反馈的方法。因此,可以连续进行工程和现场服务之间的知识共享,以提供产品开发的显着提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号