【24h】

METROLOGY OF IDENTIFICATION TESTS

机译:识别测试计量

获取原文

摘要

The role of qualitative chemical analysis is well recognized by Pharmacopoeias [1] where the most of tests are intended to conform the chemical identity of the analyte as is or in a mixture. In the later case the identification is mostly based on separation and use of specific reagents. Three types of qualitative analysis are widely used in many fields. The first deals with yes/no responses according to the pre-set threshold. The second, like USP Spectrophotometry test <197> is based on profile comparison. The third referred to as sample classification [2] or discriminant analysis compares the spectral information of unknown sample within a database in order to determine which class (group) of standard is the most similar to the unknown. Reliability of the "yes/no" identification depends on sensitivity of the specific reaction. Reliability of profile comparison can be estimated in a few ways: a) as a ratio of peaks (observed in the spectrum or in the chromatogram) that can be referred according to the reference as "true" peaks to the total number of peaks; b) comparison of the profiles [3]; c) probability estimations of peak recognition as proposed in [4]. Using of models [2-4] requires existence of well characterized standards, the peaks are required to be well separated and the deviation of the peak positions should be statistically homogeneous. Identification/classification of polymorphs - compounds containing the same chemical entities, but differing by their solid state structure - requires special approach. The reasons for this are both the nature of the sample and the limitations caused by the measurement technique: a) polymorphism is a property of the solid state. Therefore, polymorphs can not be separated from their mixtures and/or from the solid matrix by traditional techniques; b) degree of crystallinity and amorphous phase content may affect the measured properties; c) on storage the polymorphs can convert to a thermodynamically more stable form; d) sample treatment (e.g. heating, irradiation, grinding or pressing ) may cause polymorphic transitions. Therefore, for example, the diffuse reflectance measurement mode is mostly used for FTIR, Raman and NIR spectroscopic experiments. e) the spectra of polymorphs show high degree of similarity. In a lot of cases the spectral regions where the differences are observed are occupied by broad, superimposed and week absorption bands. f) compendia reference standards are not available. Therefore, an "appropriate characterized" in-house primary reference standard must be established.
机译:质量化学分析的作用得到了Pharmacopoeias [1],其中大多数测试旨在符合分析物的化学特性,如是或混合。在后面的情况下,鉴定主要是基于特定试剂的分离和使用。三种类型的定性分析广泛用于许多领域。根据预设阈值,第一个处理是/否响应。第二种,如USP分光光度法测试<197>基于轮廓比较。作为样本分类[2]或判别分析的第三个称为数据库内未知样本的光谱信息,以确定标准的哪个类(组)与未知最相似。 “是/否”鉴定的可靠性取决于特定反应的灵敏度。简档比较的可靠性可以以几种方式估计:a)作为可以根据“真实”峰的峰值的峰值(在光谱或色谱图中观察到的频谱中观察到的比率)。 b)曲线的比较[3]; c)[4]中提出的峰值识别的概率估计。使用模型[2-4]需要存在良好的表征标准,所以峰是良好分开的,并且峰位置的偏差应该是统计均匀的。多晶型物的鉴定/分类 - 含有相同化学实体的化合物,但通过固态结构的不同区别 - 需要特殊的方法。这既有原因则样本的性质和由测量技术引起的限制:a)多态性是固态的性质。因此,通过传统技术不能与它们的混合物和/或来自固体基质分离的多晶型物; b)结晶度和无定形相含量可能影响测量的性质; c)在储存上,多晶型物可以转化为热力学上更稳定的形式; d)样品处理(例如加热,照射,研磨或压制)可能导致多晶型转变。因此,例如,漫反射测量模式主要用于FTIR,拉曼和NIR光谱实验。 e)多晶型物的光谱显示出高度的相似性。在很多情况下,观察到差异的光谱区域被广泛,叠加和周吸收带占据。 f)组合的参考标准不可用。因此,必须建立“适当的表征”内部主要参考标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号