首页> 外文会议>IFIP conference on e-commerce, e-business, e-government >Is The Answer to the Machine Really in the Machine? Technical copyright protection and file-sharing communities
【24h】

Is The Answer to the Machine Really in the Machine? Technical copyright protection and file-sharing communities

机译:机器上的答案是否真正在机器中?技术版权保护和文件共享社区

获取原文

摘要

E-.commerce and content distribution models rely on working copyright protection. Copyright is a part of the necessary trust infrastructure of e-commerce for immaterial goods.The recently introduced legal protection of technical measures is theoretically interesting in that it uses legislation to protect a certain form of architecture. This seemingly double protection is also highly paradoxical, since the technical measures were invented in part to deal with law being unable to protect content on the Internet. We use file-sharing networks, where most piracy is found, to formulate hypotheses about this legislation. It is suspected that the number of circumventions and cracks is low relative to the number of copies - implying that few people actually circumvent copyright protection. While this may seem to strengthen the usefulness of trying to stop such circumvention, we will argue that the relatively low number is not due to a cost constraint, but to the low actual demand for cracks, as opposed to copies and that current legislation will fail.
机译:E-.commerce和内容分发模型依赖于工作版权保护。版权是非物质商品的必要信托基础设施的一部分。最近引入了技术措施的法律保护是理论上的有趣,因为它使用立法来保护某种形式的建筑。这种看似双重的保护也是高度矛盾的,因为这些措施是部分地处理无法在互联网上保护内容的法律。我们使用文件共享网络,其中大多数盗版,制定关于此法例的假设。据怀疑,相对于拷贝数量的绕线和裂缝数量很低 - 这意味着很少有人实际上是规避版权保护。虽然这可能似乎加强了试图停止这种规避的有用性,但我们将争辩说相对较低的数量不是由于成本约束,而是对裂缝的实际需求低,而不是副本,目前的立法将失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号