Towards More Environmentally ICT-products: Could Evaluation of Policy Instruments Contribute?

机译：走向更多环保信息通信技术产品：可以评估政策工具的贡献吗？

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The paper looks on the upcoming and existing policy instruments in the ICT sector. It tries to evaluate these instruments. Using three examples it shows that the presented framework for evaluations on policy instruments is not yet sufficiently developed.

机译：该论文介绍了ICT部门即将到来的现有政策工具。它试图评估这些乐器。使用三个例子表明，尚未充分开发出对政策工具的评估框架。

著录项

来源
《Conference on informatics for environmental protection》|2002年||共8页
会议地点
作者
Thomas Dworak; Thomas Langrock;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类信息与知识传播;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Evaluating environmental policy instruments mixes; a methodology illustrated by noise policy in the Netherlands [J] . Miriam Weber, Peter P. J. Driessen, Hens A. C. Runhaar Journal of Environmental Planning and Management . 2014,第9a10期

机译：评估环境政策手段组合;荷兰的噪音政策说明了一种方法
2. Use of explorative scenarios in environmental policy-making-Evaluation of policy instruments for management of land, water and the built environment [J] . Asa Svenfelt, Rebecka Engstroem, Mattias Hoejer Futures . 2010,第10期

机译：探索性方案在环境决策中的使用-土地，水和建筑环境管理政策工具的评估
3. Market environmentalism, new environmental policy instruments, and climate policy in the United Kingdom and Germany [J] . Bailey I Annals of the Association of American Geographers . 2007,第3期

机译：英国和德国的市场环境主义，新的环境政策工具和气候政策
4. Towards More Environmentally ICT-products: Could Evaluation of Policy Instruments Contribute? [C] . Thomas Dworak, Thomas Langrock Conference on informatics for environmental protection . 2002

机译：走向更多环保信息通信技术产品：可以评估政策工具的贡献吗？
5. Institutional requisites for flexible policy instruments: Environmental policy in the United States and Russia [D] . Dunbar, Lada Kochtcheeva 2005

机译：灵活政策工具的制度要求：美国和俄罗斯的环境政策
6. The Heterogeneous Effects of Different Environmental Policy Instruments on Green Technology Innovation [O] . Ming Yi, Xiaomeng Fang, Le Wen, 2019

机译：不同环境政策手段对绿色技术创新的异质影响
7. Competing Recombinant Technologies for Environmental Innovation: Extending Arthur’s Model of Lock-in Abstract: This article presents a model of sequential decisions about investments in environmentally dirty and clean technologies, which extends the path-dependence framework of Arthur (1989). This allows us to evaluate if and how an economy locked into a dirty technology can be unlocked and move towards the clean technology. The main extension involves the inclusion of the effect of recombinant innovation of the two technologies. A mechanism of endogenous competition is described involving a positive externality of increasing returns to investment which are counterbalanced by recombinant innovation. We determine conditions under which lock-in can be avoided or escaped. A second extension is â€œsymmetry breakingâ€ of the system due to the introduction of an environmental policy that charges a price for polluting. A final extension adds a cost of environmental policy in the form of lower returns on investment implemented through a growth-depressing factor. We compare cumulative pollution under different scenarios, so that we can evaluate the combination of environmental regulation and recombinant innovation. [O] . Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Zeppini Rossi P. 100

机译：用于环境创新的竞争重组技术：扩展亚瑟的锁定模型摘要：本文介绍了关于环境污染和清洁技术投资的连续决策模型，该模型扩展了亚瑟（1989）的路径依赖框架。这使我们能够评估是否以及如何解锁陷入肮脏技术的经济并转向清洁技术。主要的扩展涉及包括两种技术的重组创新的效果。内生竞争的机制被描述为涉及通过重组创新抵消的增加投资回报的正外部性。我们确定可以避免或转义锁定的条件。由于引入了污染价格的环境政策，第二个延伸是系统的“对称性破坏”。最后的延期增加了环境政策的成本，通过增长抑制因素实现了较低的投资回报。我们比较了不同情景下的累积污染，从而可以评估环境调控与重组创新的结合。

Towards More Environmentally ICT-products: Could Evaluation of Policy Instruments Contribute?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅