首页> 外文会议>Solid Waste Association of North America annual landfill gas symposium >A RISK BASED SYSTEM FOR POST-CLOSURE CARE ― REFORMING THE 30-YEAR TIME-BASED SYSTEM OF RCRA SUBTITLE D
【24h】

A RISK BASED SYSTEM FOR POST-CLOSURE CARE ― REFORMING THE 30-YEAR TIME-BASED SYSTEM OF RCRA SUBTITLE D

机译:封闭后护理的风险系统改革rcra字幕的30年时间系统D.

获取原文

摘要

In 1991, the U.S. EPA promulgated regulations governing the disposal of non-hazardous wastes in landfills under Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). By 1996, there were approximately 3,100 permitted landfills, and landfills are projected to remain the dominant form of municipal solid waste (MSW) management in the U.S. for the foreseeable future. Once a landfill is closed, the site owner is required to monitor and maintain the site for what is referred to as the post-closure care period. Post-closure care activities include leachate collection and treatment, groundwater monitoring, inspection and maintenance of the final cover, and monitoring to insure that landfill gas does not migrate off site or into on-site buildings. Subtitle D specifies a 30-year post-closure care period unless this period is extended or shortened by the governing regulatory agency on a site-specific basis. The decision to extend or shorten the post-closure care period is based on whether the landfill is a threat to human health or the environment. Financial management practices of private landfill owners provide funds for maintaining the closed landfill through the required 30-year post-closure period. The implication of Subtitle D is that, by the end of the 30-year interval, the landfill will be allowed to cease post-closure care. However, federal regulations are unclear as to whether the post-closure period will actually end, and the regulations contain no procedure to define when a landfill no longer poses a threat to the environment other than referencing three risk assessment guidance documents for evaluating leachate management. Such criteria are needed to enable regulators to make defensible decisions on maintaining, extending, or reducing the 30-year post-closure care period. The objective of this paper is to present a new conceptual model to define when to end post-closure care. This paper describes processes that are needed and that will help reform the current 30 year time based system under Subtitle D. The new model addresses all aspects of landfill post-closure monitoring and maintenance including leachate collection and treatment, gas collection and treatment, monitoring, and maintenance of the final cover. The approach includes a series of decision points at which the source, point(s) of compliance, and potential environmental receptors are evaluated in a manner consistent with existing regulations. Rather than rely on a determination that post-closure monitoring is either complete or must be continued at the same level of intensity, the model evaluates each potential release and exposure mechanism individually and allows for the possibility that certain aspects of post-closure care could be discontinued before others. For example, it may be appropriate to discontinue active gas collection due to very low gas production rates or groundwater monitoring due to acceptable risk factors. At the same time, it may be entirely appropriate to continue cover inspections and maintenance to insure that cracks do not lead to increased leachate production. The conceptual approach presented in this paper represents a more realistic and environmentally protective strategy for the management of closed landfills than the current approach under Subtitle D. The approach would enable the owner/operator to identify those operational practices that can best mitigate environmental risk, and where practicable, implement certain practices at closed sites (e.g. leachate recirculation) to help reduce long-term risk to the environment. The authors believe that the proposed approach will result in increased protection of human health and the environment because assessments of environmental impact and potential risk posed by the source will be required before any aspect of post-closure care may be discontinued. Implementation and refinement of this approach will require discussions with regulators and demonstration of its appropriateness thro
机译:1991年,美国环保局颁布的管辖下的资源保护和回收法的字幕d(RCRA)堆填区处置非危险废物的法规。到1996年,有总数约为3100允许的垃圾填埋场,垃圾填埋场,并预计将保持城市固体废弃物(MSW)管理的主要形式在美国可预见的未来。一旦填埋场封场,网站所有者需要监视和维护所谓的关闭后的护理期间该网站。闭合后的护理活动包括渗滤液收集和处理,地下水监测,检验和最终覆盖的维护和监控,以确保垃圾填埋气不迁移异地或到现场的建筑物。字幕d指定了30年封闭后的护理期限,除非这期间延长或由理事监管机构网站特有的基础上缩短。延长或缩短关闭后护理期限的决定是基于填埋场是否对人类健康或环境造成威胁。私家车主垃圾填埋场的财务管理实践,通过所需要的30年封闭后时期维持已封闭填埋场提供资金。字幕d的含义是,通过30年的间隔时间结束时,垃圾填埋场将被允许停止关闭后的护理。然而,联邦法规都不清楚到关闭后的时期是否会真正结束,并且规定不包含程序定义当垃圾填埋场不再对不是引用三个险评估的指导性文件评估渗滤液管理等环境造成威胁。需要这样的标准,以使监管机构在保持,延长,或减少30年封闭后的护理期限作出辩护的决定。本文的目的是提出一种新的概念模型来定义何时结束关闭后的护理。本文根据字幕D.描述是需要的流程和这将有助于改革目前的30年的时间为基础的系统的新模式地址填埋封场后监测和维护的所有方面,包括渗滤液收集和处理,废气收集处理,监控,与维护最终覆盖的。该方法包括一系列在所述源顺应性,点(一个或多个),和潜在的环境受体在与现有的规定相一致的方式进行评估决策点。而不是依赖的确定,关闭后的监测是完全或必须在强度相同水平的继续,该模型分别评估每一个潜在的释放和曝光机制,允许的可能性,关闭后护理的某些方面可能是在别人面前停产。例如,它可能会由于非常低的产气率或地下水,由于可接受的风险因素监测适当终止活性气体的收集。同时,可以完全不适宜继续盖检查和维护,以确保使裂纹不会导致增加生产渗滤液。在本文提出的概念方法代表了关闭的堆填区比在字幕D.该方法目前的做法的管理更加逼真和环境的保护策略将使得业主/运营商,以识别那些操作实践最能减轻环境风险,在可行情况下,落实关闭网站的某些做法(如渗滤液回灌),以帮助降低长期环境风险。作者认为,该方法会导致人体健康的增加和环境的保护,因为环境的影响,由源带来的潜在风险评估将关闭后护理的任何方面可能停药前需要。这种方式的实现和完善,需要其适当的救援人员到场与监管机构和示范讨论

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号