首页> 外文会议>World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology Infertility >Poly cystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Can We Unify Two Points of View?
【24h】

Poly cystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Can We Unify Two Points of View?

机译:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS):我们可以统一两个观点吗?

获取原文

摘要

Although PCOS is an extremely prevalent disorder in women and is likely to be the most common endocrinopathy, figures of the prevalence of PCOS in women varies considerably depending on how it is diagnosed (1). The reason for all the confusion is the heteterogeneity and wide spectrum of symptoms and signs in PCOS. In the United States, the predominant view is that the diagnosis is based on the finding of irregular cycles and anovulation together with androgen excess. This diagnosis is independent of ovarian morphological findings, but other disorders such as tumors, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and Cushing's syndrome, need to be ruled out. This was the view of a meeting of "experts" at NIH in 1990 (2) which has been referred to as a consensus meeting, but was never designed to be this. Using this definition, the prevalence of PCOS is thought to be in the range of 3-8% (3).
机译:虽然PCOS在女性中是一种极其普遍的疾病,但很可能是最常见的内分泌病变,但女性PCOS的患病率的数据取决于它的诊断方式(1)。所有混淆的原因是PCOS中的症状和症状范围广的症状和迹象。在美国,主要的观点是诊断基于发现不规则循环和无腺过量的无规循环和瓣膜。这种诊断与卵巢形态学发现无关,但需要排除肿瘤,先天性肾上腺增生和缓冲综合征等其他疾病。这是1990年第1990(2)岁的“专家”会议的看法已被称为协商一致会议,但从来没有设计成为这一点。使用这种定义,PCO的普遍性被认为是3-8%(3)的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号