首页> 外文会议>SLA annual conference >Corporate Bunker or Cyber Cafe: Rethinking the Strategic Role of the Library in the Corporation ― A Case Study
【24h】

Corporate Bunker or Cyber Cafe: Rethinking the Strategic Role of the Library in the Corporation ― A Case Study

机译:公司堡垒或网络咖啡厅:重新思考图书馆在公司的战略作用 - 以案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Certainly one of the most painful questions to be asked of a corporate librarian is "what is the value of the 'library' to the business?" Following an initial pause, often there is a volley of cost savings figures cited, and even a smattering of anecdotal evidence illustrating the value of the library. Invariably, the question raises anew the irrepressible issue "what is value?" and "how do we measure it?" Given the fact that some estimates put the total number of corporate libraries in the neighborhood of 10,000 with an associated operating budget of $3.2 billion, the question is not easily avoided. Indeed, not to address the issue directly can and has invited competing business demands vying for scarce library and information resources. The traditional way most studies have approached the issue of valuation has been to employ an "economic replacement" cost approach or to ask end-users directly to evaluate the utility of services received. In our view both approaches are flawed. Cost analysis is not the same as valuation analysis. An object or service may, for example, cost $17.50 to reproduce or replace, but the value of the service may be far less or far greater than $17.50. A replacement cost approach may therefore under or over-estimate the true value of services, and it is highly unlikely, that even the directionality let alone the magnitude of the bias can be discerned. On the other hand, asking end-users to evaluate services consumed avoids the "cost" problem but creates a problem of comparability and objectivity. Two individuals may perceive the value of the same service quite differently. Library-assisted document searches are a case in point. Some end-users prefer to do their own searches while others will prefer professional assistance. Are we then to conclude that the aggregate value of the service is "zero?" and if not, how do we combine utility scores across individuals and across business units? So what is to be done or said in response to the question, "what is the value of the library to the business? and more pointedly, what can or should we as practioners be doing to enhance that value? We believe that the key to understanding and measuring the value of information services is to take a strategic rather than product or service perspective. In our view, corporate libraries and information services only create value, to the extent to which they directly or indirectly contribute to the strategic goals and objectives of the corporation. Creating, sustaining and enhancing value requires a continuous process of aligning and realigning the infrastructure, processes and services of the library on the one hand, with the larger corporate objectives on the other hand. Based on work-in-process at Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), this paper illustrates this value-alignment or strategy-focused approach. As part of a larger space-needs assessment study, BMS undertook a long-term strategic assessment of the future position of the library within the corporation. The main driver in this assessment was to enhance the overall value of the library to the corporation. While the work is ongoing, we believe the approach and methodology used here has broader applications outside of the pharmaceutical industry. Prior to describing this work however, we first look at a couple of the prevailing archetypes of the corporate library. The first is what we have termed the "bunker" mentality, and the second, its counterpoint, here referred to as the "cyber cafe." These two models provide a useful context for understanding the concept of the strategy-focused library.
机译:当然,要问过企业图书馆员的最痛苦的问题之一是“图书馆”对业务的价值是什么?“在初始暂停之后,通常会有一个成本节省的众多节省的数字,甚至颤抖的轶事证据说明了图书馆的价值。总的来说,问题提出了一个不可抑制的问题“什么是价值?” “我们如何衡量它?”鉴于有些估计估计为10,000家附近的企业图书馆总数达到了32亿美元,问题不容易避免。事实上,不是直接解决问题,并邀请竞争业务需求争夺稀缺图书馆和信息资源。大多数研究已经接近估值问题的传统方式一直聘请“经济替代”成本方法或直接询问最终用户,以评估收到的服务的效用。在我们看来,两种方法都有缺陷。成本分析与估值分析不同。例如,对象或服务可能会花费17.50美元来重现或更换,但服务的价值可能远小于17.50美元。因此,替代成本方法可能会削弱或过度估计服务的真实价值,并且它非常不可能,即使方向性也可以辨别出偏差的大小。另一方面,要求最终用户评估消耗的服务避免了“成本”问题,而是创造了可比性和客观性的问题。两个人可能会感知同一服务的价值非常不同。图书馆辅助文档搜索是一个案例。一些最终用户愿意进行自己的搜索,而其他用户则更喜欢专业的帮助。然后我们得出结论,服务的总价值是“零?”如果没有,我们如何将跨国公司和跨业务部门结合的效用分数?所以要做什么或者在回答这个问题时说,“图书馆对业务的价值是什么?更有目的,我们应该或者我们应该在实例中做些什么来增强这种价值?我们相信关键理解和测量信息服务的价值是采取战略而不是产品或服务的角度。我们认为,企业图书馆和信息服务只会创造价值,以便他们直接或间接促进战略目标和目标该公司。创造,维持和增强价值需要一方面与较大的公司目标一方面对齐和重新调整图书馆的基础设施,流程和服务的持续过程。基于布里斯托尔的工作过程Myers Squibb(BMS),本文说明了这种价值对准或以战略为中心的方法。作为更大的空间需求评估研究的一部分,BMS进行了长期的战略屁股在公司内图书馆未来职位的物质。本评估中的主要驱动因素是提高图书馆对公司的总体价值。虽然工作正在进行中,我们认为这里使用的方法和方法具有更广泛的制药行业外应用。然而,在描述这项工作之前,我们首先看看公司图书馆的几个主要原型。首先是我们所谓的“掩体”心态,而第二个是它的对比,这里被称为“网络咖啡馆”。这两个模型为了解逻辑侧重于战略库的概念提供了一个有用的上下文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号