【24h】

HOST SPECIFICITY IN WEED BIOCONTROL

机译:杂草生物控制中的宿主特异性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Host range determination is essential to exclude release of weed biocontrol agents harmful to desirable plants. Presently this is largely based on host range surveys in the native region and lack of larval development in no-choice tests. About 10% of the agents established in Canada have no-choice host ranges narrower than the field range, 20% are the same and 70% are broader. Over 90% of those in the last category developed in no-choice test on North American plants closely related to the host; but only 4% have attacked them in the field. The native flora is a sensitive issue so there is an urgent need to identify which are actually at risk. A combination of the native field host range and no-choice test limits risk to a plant taxon. Not releasing agents that develop on critical plants in the taxon eliminates most biocontrol agents. Four strategies less destructive to weed biocontrol are suggested for achieving the same end. 1) Extend the host range surveys to determine the candidates physical and biological needs. 2) Restrict release to candidate agents not accepting the critical plants in native-region field tests. 3) Determine risk from the relative suitability of critical plants to the host. 4) Reject candidates if host finding or acceptance of critical plants is inherited. These strategies are not mutually exclusive.
机译:宿主范围测定对于排除释放对所需植物的杂草生物控制剂的释放至关重要。目前,这主要基于本土地区的主机范围调查以及在无选择测试中缺乏幼虫发育。大约10%的在加拿大建立的代理商没有比场范围窄的选择宿主范围,20%相同,70%更广泛。在北美植物与主持人密切相关的北美工厂的无选择性测试中开发了超过90%的人;但只有4%的人在现场袭击了他们。本土植物是一个敏感的问题,所以迫切需要识别其实际上有风险。本机场主机范围和无选择测试的组合限制了植物分类的风险。在分类群中的关键植物上没有发布的代理商消除了大多数生物控制代理商。建议为实现相同的杂草生物控制而减少有四种策略。 1)延长宿主范围调查以确定候选人的身体和生物需求。 2)将释放限制为不接受本地区域测试中的关键植物的候选药剂。 3)确定临界植物对主体的相对适用性的风险。 4)如果寄主发现或接受关键植物,则拒绝候选人。这些策略不是互斥的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号