首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Software Measurement >Good or Bad Committers? A Case Study of Committers' Cautiousness and the Consequences on the Bug Fixing Process in the Eclipse Project
【24h】

Good or Bad Committers? A Case Study of Committers' Cautiousness and the Consequences on the Bug Fixing Process in the Eclipse Project

机译:好或坏提交者?提交人持谨慎案例研究对蚀项目中的错误修复过程的案例研究

获取原文

摘要

There are many roles to play in the bug fixing process in open source software development. A developer called ``Committer'', who has a permission to submit a patch into software repository, plays a major role in this process and hold a key to the successfulness of the project. In this work, we have observed each committer activities from the Eclipse-Platform bug tracking system and version archives. Despite the importance of committer's activities, we suspected that sometimes committers can make mistakes, which have negative consequences to the bug fixing process. Our research focus on studying the consequences of each committer's activities to this process. We collected each committer's historical data and evaluated each of them by comparing the more cautiousness to less cautiousness committers. Then we looked deeper into each committer's characteristics to see the reasons why some committers tend to make mistakes more than the others. From our results, we would like to make a humbly suggestion to the OSS's committers to be aware of their importance to the projects and be cautious before doing their jobs.
机译:在开源软件开发中的错误修复过程中播放许多角色。一个名为“committer”的开发人员,谁有权限将修补程序提交到软件存储库中,在此过程中发挥着重要作用,并保持了项目的成功的关键。在这项工作中,我们从Eclipse-Platform Bug跟踪系统和版本档案中观察了每个宣布活动。尽管知识分子的活动重要性,但我们怀疑有时提交者可以犯错误,这对错误定影过程产生了负面影响。我们的研究侧重于研究每个知名活动对此过程的后果。我们收集了每个提名的历史数据,并通过比较更加谨慎的承诺的谨慎态度来评估每个人。然后我们深入了解每个知名特征,看看一些提交者倾向于犯错误的原因。从我们的结果来看,我们希望为OSS的提交人提出谦卑地建议,以了解他们对项目的重要性,并且在做工作之前要谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号