首页> 外文期刊>IEICE transactions on information and systems >Good or Bad Committers? —— A Case Study of Committer's Activities on the Eclipse's Bug Fixing Process
【24h】

Good or Bad Committers? —— A Case Study of Committer's Activities on the Eclipse's Bug Fixing Process

机译:好还是坏的通勤者? -提交者在Eclipse的Bug修复过程中的活动的案例研究

获取原文
           

摘要

There are many roles to play in the bug fixing process in open source software development. A developer called “Committer”, who has a permission to submit a patch into a software repository, plays a major role in this process and holds a key to the successfulness of the project. Despite the importance of committer's activities, we suspect that sometimes committers can make mistakes which have some consequences to the bug fixing process (e.g., reopened bugs after bug fixing). Our research focuses on studying the consequences of each committer's activities to this process. We collected each committer's historical data from the Eclipse-Platform's bug tracking system and version control system and evaluated their activities using bug status in the bug tracking system and commit log in the version control system. Then we looked deeper into each committer's characteristics to see the reasons why some committers tend to make mistakes more than the others.
机译:在开源软件开发的错误修复过程中,有许多作用。有权将修补程序提交到软件存储库中的名为“ Committer”的开发人员在此过程中扮演着重要角色,并且是项目成功的关键。尽管提交者的活动很重要,但是我们怀疑提交者有时会犯一些错误,这些错误会给错误修复过程带来一些后果(例如,在错误修复后重新打开错误)。我们的研究重点是研究每个提交者的活动对该过程的后果。我们从Eclipse平台的错误跟踪系统和版本控制系统收集了每个提交者的历史数据,并使用错误跟踪系统中的错误状态和版本控制系统中的提交日志评估了他们的活动。然后,我们对每个提交者的特征进行了更深入的研究,以了解某些提交者比其他提交者倾向于犯更多错误的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号