【24h】

Fatigue behavior of different bracket connections

机译:不同托架连接的疲劳行为

获取原文

摘要

The paper presents fatigue tests with large scale models and analysis results of a European R&D project, called FatHTS. Tested were frame corners with three different bracket details: with symmetrical flange, with symmetrical flange and additional bracket nose modification, and with one-sided flange with sniped ends. In order to be able to make a comparison, the hot spot strain was determined by strain gauge measurements at all corners of each model. The FE results lead to higher hot spot strains and also the strain increases earlier in front of the hot spot. This is due to the different weld geometry in the drawing and in reality. In most cases the crack initiation did not occur as expected at the hot spot. The crack started at the root and propagated through the weld. Additional stress analyses revealed the cause of the unexpected crack behaviour. This was due to the fact that the weld carries the full load. The fatigue tests showed that it is difficult to predict the root failure in complex structures. The hot spot concept does not cover the metallurgical notch which occurs during fabrication. For toe failure good agreement is obtained between prediction and tests if the failure is defined as through-thickness crack.
机译:本文提出了具有大规模模型和欧洲研发项目的分析结果的疲劳试验,称为热线。测试是具有三种不同的支架细节的框架角:具有对称法兰,具有对称法兰和额外的支架鼻修饰,以及带有狙击端的单面法兰。为了能够进行比较,通过每个模型的所有角落的应变仪测量测量热点菌株。 Fe结果导致较高的热点菌株,并且在热点前面的菌株也增加。这是由于绘图中的不同焊接几何形状和现实。在大多数情况下,裂纹开始不会在热点预期发生。裂缝从根开始并通过焊接传播。额外的压力分析显示出意外的裂缝行为的原因。这是由于焊缝带有满载的事实。疲劳试验表明,难以预测复杂结构中的根本失效。热点概念不会覆盖在制造期间发生的冶金凹口。对于脚趾故障,在预测和测试之间获得良好的一致性,如果故障被定义为通厚裂纹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号