首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety >Preventive Strike vs. Counter Intelligence and Protection for a Target under Attack
【24h】

Preventive Strike vs. Counter Intelligence and Protection for a Target under Attack

机译:预防性罢工与攻击攻击目标的反智能和保护

获取原文

摘要

A defender protects a target from being attacked. It can carry out two kinds of strategies. One is passive defense strategy. The other is active defense strategy. When the defender executes the passive defense strategy, it can deploy camouflage to misinform the attacker. When the defender runs the active defense strategy, it strikes the attacker preventively. Then, the defender will reveals itself and therefore, the attacker detects the target without the intelligence contest. Depending on the strategy chosen by the defender, the attacker should succeed in double contest games to destroy the target. In the case of passive defense it should win the target intelligence and impact contests. In the case of active defense it should win the preventive strike and impact contests. The attacker allocates its resources among the intelligence, the impact and self-protection efforts, whereas the defender distributes its resources among the counter intelligence, protection and the preventive strike efforts. The attacker attempts to maximize the target vulnerability, but oppositely the defender desires to minimize it. The paper develops two non-cooperative two-period minmax games.
机译:后卫保护目标受到攻击。它可以进行两种策略。一个是被动防御策略。另一个是主动防御策略。当防御者执行被动防御策略时,它可以部署伪装以误入攻击者。当后卫运行主动防御策略时,它会袭击攻击者。然后,防守者将揭示自己,因此,攻击者没有智力竞争的情况会检测到目标。根据后卫选择的策略,攻击者应该成功地取得双竞赛游戏来销毁目标。在被动防御的情况下,它应该赢得目标智能和影响竞赛。在主动防御的情况下,它应该赢得预防罢工和影响竞赛。攻击者在智力,影响和自我保护努力中分配资源,而后卫在反情意,保护和预防罢工中分配资源。攻击者试图最大限度地提高目标漏洞,但反对后卫希望最小化它。本文开发了两个非合作两期Minmax游戏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号