首页> 外文会议>Annual European aviation safety seminar >Approach to Stall Training: Practical or Pedantic?
【24h】

Approach to Stall Training: Practical or Pedantic?

机译:走势训练的方法:实用或迂腐?

获取原文

摘要

For many years, the airline industry has witnessed a number of loss of control accidents following inadvertent approaches to stall. There have been many more accidents in other segments of the industry where sophisticated aircraft with trained — many type-rated — airmen have lost control following a stall event. During one five-week period at the beginning of 2009, there were three approach to stall events — all during ILS approach on the autopilot — that resulted in airline accidents. Granted, there were errors of some sort in each case, but a number of lives were lost during events that airmen ostensibly are trained for in all type-rating programs. One of these accidents has caused a tremendous upheaval — largely political — in the U.S. The resultant congressional act is resulting in a number of new laws and regulations that will have remarkable effects on the U.S. airline industry. Some of these changes will bring welcome and constructive changes. (Some will not.)
机译:多年来,航空公司行业目睹了无意地迁移的途径之后损失了一系列控制事故。在具有培训的复杂飞机的行业中存在许多事故发生了许多事故 - 许多类型的额定 - 飞行员在摊位事件后失去了控制。在2009年初的一个五周期期间,有三种罢工事件 - 在自动驾驶仪上的ILS方法期间 - 导致航空公司事故。授予,每种情况都有某种东西的错误,但在艾弗曼表面上培训的活动期间,许多生命都丢失了所有类型评级计划。其中一个事故引起了巨大的艰巨 - 在大大政治中 - 在美国。所得国会法案导致一些新的法律法规,对美国航空公司行业具有显着影响。其中一些变化将带来欢迎和建设性的变化。 (有些人不会。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号