Using phenotypic sharing in a classifier tool

机译：在分类器工具中使用表型共享

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper describes a classifier tool that uses a genetic algorithm to make rule induction. The genetic algorithm uses the Michigan approach, is domain independent and is able to process continuous and discrete attributes. Some optimizations include the use of phenotypic sharing (with linear complexity) to direct the search. The results of accuracy are compared with other 33 algorithms in 32 datasets. The difference of accuracy is not statistically significant at the 10percent level when compared with the best of the other 33 algorithms. The implementation allows the configuration of many parameters, and intends to be improved with the inclusion of new operators.

机译：本文介绍了一种使用遗传算法进行规则诱导的分类器工具。遗传算法使用密歇根州的方法，是域独立的，能够处理连续和离散的属性。一些优化包括使用表型共享（具有线性复杂性）来指导搜索。将精度的结果与32个数据集中的其他33种算法进行比较。与其他33算法中最好的相比，精度的差异在10平方水平时没有统计学意义。该实现允许配置许多参数，并在包含新的运算符时旨在改进。

著录项

来源
《Genetic and evolutionary computation conference》|2000年||共1页
会议地点
作者
Mozart Hasse; Aurora R.Pozo;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类进化遗传学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Cross domain adaptation by learning partially shared classifiers and weighting source data points in the shared subspaces [J] . Wang Hongqi, Xu Anfeng, Wang Shanshan, Neural computing & applications . 2018,第6期

机译：通过在共享子空间中学习部分共享的分类器和加权源数据点来进行跨域适应
2. Phenotypic variability in a family with pancreatitis and cystic fibrosis sharing common mild CFTR mutation: report on CFTR mutations and their phenotypic variability. [J] . Alghisi F, Bella S, Lucidi V Pancreas . 2009,第1期

机译：具有共同的轻度CFTR突变的胰腺炎和囊性纤维化家庭的表型变异：关于CFTR突变及其表型变异的报道。
3. Classifier shared deep network with multi-hierarchy loss for low resolution face recognition [J] . Signal Processing. Image Communication: A Publication of the the European Association for Signal Processing . 2020,第期

机译：分类器共享深度网络，具有多层次损耗的低分辨率面部识别
4. Using phenotypic sharing in a classifier tool [C] . Mozart Hasse, Aurora R.Pozo Genetic and evolutionary computation conference . 2000

机译：在分类器工具中使用表型共享
5. Facilitating knowledge sharing in organizations: Semiautonomous agents that learn to gather, classify, and distribute environmental scanning knowledge. [D] . Elofson, Gregg Steven. 1989

机译：促进组织中的知识共享：学会收集，分类和分发环境扫描知识的半自治代理。
6. Identifying and Classifying Shared Selective Sweeps from Multilocus Data [O] . Alexandre M. Harris, Michael DeGiorgio 2020

机译：从多层数据识别和分类共享选择性扫描
7. : "This paper deals with the functionality of the flaked stone assemblages from several Neolithic sites of the NE of the Iberian Peninsula. The chronological framework ranges from the mid-6th to the mid-4th millennium cal. BCE, which corresponds to the Early and Middle Neolithic. This long period ranges from the arrival of the first farming communities in the Iberian Peninsula, around 5600-5500 cal. BCE, to 3600-3500 cal. BCE, two millennia later, when Neolithic communities had stably occupied most of the available territory, from the mountainous areas of the Pyrenees to the coastal areas of the Mediterranean.In this context, the NE of the Iberian Peninsula is one of the areas where a major number of use-wear analyses have been carried out, especially for what concerns the Neolithic period. This is mainly due to the interest shown by the directors of the excavations and by the Spanish use-wear specialists as well; both participated and cooperated in order to enlarge the number of contexts studied, making the NE of the Iberian Peninsula one of the areas of Europe with the largest number of ‘functional studies’. As a result, today we have a reliable picture of the type of lithic tools used by the first farming groups, how they were used, and which needs they were satisfying.The methodology employed for this type of analysis is today broadly shared by most use-wear specialists. A stereoscopic microscope is used together with a reflected-light microscope for the analysis of the archaeological specimens. Afterwards, the observed use-wear traces are compared with the traces from experimental tools. This study primarily made use of the tools preserved at the ‘Traceoteque’ of the Institución Milà y Fontanals of the CSIC of Barcelona.This paper presents the results obtained for the different types of analysed sites and the relative lithic assemblages. In this way, tools from different contexts are compared: open-air sites, caves and rock-shelters, pit-sites, burials, and mining sites. Such a diversity of contexts allowed for the exploration of the existence of recurrences and differences in the functionality of the lithic tools from one site to another. The results obtained have also provided information on some aspects related to the economic processes carried out at the different sites, caves, rock-shelters and open-air contexts. It has been possible to gain fresh data on the types of tasks carried out and their relative importance for each site, their relation with the geographical and environmental context and the natural resources available there. In addition, analysing tools recovered from burials – mainly individual inhumations – provided information on the relationships between the buried individuals and the working tools, in particular exploring the relationships between sex and age patterns and the types of tools deposited as goods.In conclusion, use-wear analysis allowed for the exploration of a variety of issues; from technical aspects related to the production and management of the lithic resources to social aspects related to the subsistence activities and the individuals that carried them out." [O] . Gibaja Bao, Juan Francisco, Mazzucco, Niccolo 2015

机译：：“本文研究了伊比利亚半岛东北部几个新石器时代遗址的片状石材组合的功能。时间框架从公元前6世纪中叶到4世纪中叶，分别对应于早期和早期。新石器时代中期，这段时间的长短是从伊比利亚半岛的第一个农业社区到来，大约在公元前5600-5500 cal，到了两千年后的3600-3500 BCE，当时新石器时代的社区稳定地占据了大部分可用土地。从比利牛斯山脉山区到地中海沿岸地区。在这种情况下，伊比利亚半岛东北部是进行过大量使用磨损分析的地区之一，尤其是在关注方面新石器时代，这主要是由于发掘负责人和西班牙使用服装专家表现出的浓厚兴趣；他们参与和合作以扩大孔蒂的数量xts进行了研究，使伊比利亚半岛的NE成为“功能研究”数量最多的欧洲地区之一。结果，今天我们可以可靠地了解第一批耕作小组使用的石器工具的类型，使用方法以及它们满足的需求。今天，大多数使用方法广泛共享用于这种类型的分析的方法穿专家。立体显微镜与反射光显微镜一起用于分析考古样本。然后，将观察到的使用磨损痕迹与实验工具的痕迹进行比较。这项研究主要利用了巴塞罗那CSIC的米拉·丰塔纳尔研究所的“ Traceoteque”中保存的工具。本文介绍了针对不同类型的分析地点和相对石器组合所获得的结果。通过这种方式，可以比较来自不同环境的工具：露天场所，洞穴和岩石避难所，露天场所，埋葬场所和采矿场所。如此多样的上下文允许探索重复性的存在以及从一个站点到另一个站点的石器工具的功能差异。所获得的结果还提供了与在不同地点，洞穴，避难所和露天环境中进行的经济过程有关的某些方面的信息。可以获得有关所执行任务的类型及其对每个站点的相对重要性，它们与地理和环境环境以及那里可用自然资源的关系的新数据。此外，对从墓葬中回收的工具（主要是个人遗体）进行分析，可提供有关被掩埋的个体与工作工具之间关系的信息，尤其是探索性别与年龄模式之间的关系以及作为商品存放的工具的类型。磨损分析允许探索各种问题；从与石器资源的生产和管理有关的技术方面到与自给活动及其实施者有关的社会方面。”

Using phenotypic sharing in a classifier tool

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅