首页> 外文会议>World multiconference on systems, cybernetics and informatics >An evaluation of BPR methodologies adopting NIMSAD a systematic framework for understanding and evaluating methodologies
【24h】

An evaluation of BPR methodologies adopting NIMSAD a systematic framework for understanding and evaluating methodologies

机译:采用NIMSAD的BPR方法评估系统框架,用于理解和评估方法

获取原文

摘要

A methodology is an explicit mechanism for helping to solve problems and recent years have seen a significant increase in the availability of Business Process Reengineering. Methodologies to enterprises. Due to such availability, it has become important to compare in order to perform classifications and to improve future methodological frameworks development. Hence, an important issue and a necessity for emerging methodologies like Business Process Re-engineering, Business Process Improvement, and Continuous Process Improvement. A thorough survey of BPR Methodologies was conducted and five BPR methodologies were chosen because of their varying background and their claims to have successfully and radically improve the business processes whilst utilising their frameworks to carry out Business Process Re-engineering activities. The paper attempts to provide a detailed evaluation based on important aspects concerning BPR methodologies by utilising NIMSAD framework and to provide a comprehensive analysis of the selected methodologies.
机译:方法是有助于解决问题的明确机制,近年来已经看到业务流程再造的可用性显着增加。对企业的方法。由于此类可用性,比较才能进行分类并改善未来的方法论框架发展变得重要。因此,一个重要的问题和新出现的方法,如业务流程重新工程,业务流程改进和持续的过程改进等方法。对BPR方法进行了彻底的调查,并选择了五种BPR方法,因为它们不同的背景及其声称成功和根本地改善了业务流程,同时利用其框架进行业务流程重新工程活动。本文试图通过利用NIMSAD框架,基于关于BPR方法的重要方面提供详细的评估,并提供对所选方法的综合分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号