【24h】

Appendix a: the stopped-lead-vehicle scenario test

机译:附录A:停止引导 - 车辆场景测试

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to investigate how drivers with and without rear-end collision warning systems react when purposefully distracted just when a stationary vehicle is revealed. The test was conducted using the Iowa Driving Simulatorequipped with a driver warning system that provided auditory warnings based on two different warning criteria A total of 30 subjects was split across three conditions with 10 subjects each. The two warning distances resulted from use of two values ofdriver reaction time for a hypothetical average driver.Driver collision avoidance performance was compared to that in the baseline condition where no warning was present. Results showed that the collision warning system in the long warning condition showed shorter accelerator release reactions times, fewercrashes, and less severe crashes compared with both the baseline condition and the short warning condition. Experimental evidence suggests that the short warning condition may also have distracted drivers at the last moment after they had already begun to brake, resulting in some crashes. This is possibly a result of the warning display modality (auditory) and not a function of the timing of the warning.
机译:本研究的目的是调查如何在透露静止车辆时有目的地分散后端碰撞警告系统的驱动器。使用IOWA驾驶进行了试验,SimulaTORESQUICPECUPICESICE,该系统提供了基于两个不同的警告标准提供了听觉警告,总共30个受试者在三个条件下分裂,每个受试者每个受试者分开。由于使用两个值的两个警告距离,用于假设平均驾驶员的两个值反应时间。将避免性能进行比较,在没有警告的基线条件下进行了比较。结果表明,与基线状况和短暂警告条件相比,长时间警告条件下的碰撞警告系统显示出短的加速度释放反应时间,较少的冰淇淋,崩溃较小。实验证据表明,在他们已经开始制动之后,短暂的警告条件也可能会分散注意力的司机,导致一些崩溃。这可能是警告显示模态(听觉)的结果,而不是警告时序的函数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号