首页> 外文会议>Child Occupant Protection Symposium >An empirical comparison of the FMVSS 213 and ECE 44.03 standards for child restraints
【24h】

An empirical comparison of the FMVSS 213 and ECE 44.03 standards for child restraints

机译:FMVSS 213和ECE 44.03儿童限制标准的实证比较

获取原文

摘要

The design and manufacture of child restraints (CRS) is dependent upon the child restraint standard. Our comparison of the US FMVSS 213 and the ECE R44.03 highlights the many gross similarities and the detail differences, which distinguish the standards. As both standards now use the same dummy, comparison testing is possible. It demonstrates that the acceleration loads in both dynamic tests are similar while the dummy kinematics displayed by the CRS are dramatically different. The detail differences in the standard have however lead to different designs in the two jurisdictions, so that modern CRS from one market cannot be exported to the other without difficulty. Looking forward to the upcoming standards for universal CRS anchorages; if one feels that competition is desirable for the improvement of this product category, closer harmonization of the standards will be required.
机译:儿童限制(CRS)的设计和制造取决于儿童克制标准。我们对美国FMVSS 213和ECE R44.03的比较突出了许多总相似之处和区分标准的细节差异。由于两个标准现在使用相同的虚拟,可以进行比较测试。它表明,动态测试中的加速度负载在CRS显示的伪动性均匀不同。然而,该标准的细节差异导致了两个司法管辖区的不同设计,因此来自一个市场的现代CR不能毫无困难地出口到另一个市场。期待即将到来的通用CRS锚地标准;如果一个人认为竞争是为了改善本产品类别,则需要更接近标准的协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号