首页> 外文会议>Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology >Investigation of main rotor spindle assembly retaining rods for an army utility helicopter fabricated by three different contractors
【24h】

Investigation of main rotor spindle assembly retaining rods for an army utility helicopter fabricated by three different contractors

机译:三种不同承包商制造的军队公用事业直升机主轴主轴组件保持杆的研究

获取原文

摘要

The US Army Research Laboratory (ARL) was tasked by the US Army Aviation and Troop Command (ATCOM) to perform a metallurgical examination of main rotor spindle assembly retaining rods fabricated from precipitation hardened (PH) 13-8 Mo stainless steel by three different manufacturers ("A", "B" and "C"). These components were subjected to prior spectrum load fatigue testing in order to qualify an alternate source. Manufacturer "A" was the current source, and this testing was performed to compare the results of "B" and "C" versus "A". The "C" components exhibited only half the fatigue resistance of the "A" and "B" components. Upon dimensional examination by ARL, it was determined that the root radius of an "A" and "C" rod did not conform to the governing requirements. Although the surface roughness of the parts from each manufacturer varied, all readings met the governing requirement. Hardness results differed only slightly between the rods, however, the tensile properties (of coupons sectioned from the original rods) were significantly different. Nevertheless, the hardness and tensile results met the minimum requirements specified. The results of fatigue testing (of coupons sectioned from the original rods) showed a dramatic difference between the rods. Metallography was utilized to examine the microstructure and grain size. The structure of each rod was consistent with the prior treatment, and the grain size met the governing requirement. The amount of delta (free) ferrite within the structure varied slightly from rod to rod, but was well witin the specified limits. Banding was more prevalent witin the "C" material than the "A" and "B" material. The threads of each rod were examined metallographically, since this was the area of failure as a result of the spectrum load fatigue testing. Although differences in the surface profile of the threads from the different manufacturers was noted, there was no evidence of gross abnormalities such as tear out or chatter. The chemical analysis of each rod varied, but each composition met the governing requirements.
机译:美国陆军研究实验室(ARL)由美国陆军航空航空和部队指挥(ATCOM)负责,进行主转子主轴组件保持杆的冶金检查,由三种不同的制造商制成的沉淀(pH)13-8 Mo不锈钢制成(“A”,“B”和“C”)。对这些组分进行现有光谱载荷疲劳测试,以获得替代来源。制造商“A”是电流来源,进行该测试以比较“B”和“C”与“A”的结果进行比较。 “C”组分仅表现出“A”和“B”组分的疲劳电阻的一半。通过ARL尺寸检查,确定“A”和“C”杆的根半径不符合控制要求。虽然来自每个制造商的零件的表面粗糙度变化,但所有读数都符合治理要求。硬度结果仅在杆之间略微不同,但是,拉伸性质(从原杆切片的优惠券)显着不同。尽管如此,硬度和拉伸结果符合指定的最低要求。疲劳试验(从原杆切片的优惠券)的结果显示了杆之间的显着差异。使用金相术以检查微观结构和晶粒尺寸。每根杆的结构与先前的治疗一致,晶粒尺寸达到了控制要求。结构内的δ(自由)铁氧体的量略有不同于杆到杆,但是威特本文是良好的指定限制。系带比“A”和“B”材料更普照的普遍普遍。每根杆的螺纹都被按空位地检查,因为这是频谱载荷疲劳试验的失效面积。虽然指出了来自不同制造商的线的表面轮廓的差异,但没有证据表明撕裂或喋喋不休。每根杆的化学分析变化,但每个组成都达到了管理要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号