【24h】

Performance Comparison of ENUM Name Servers

机译:枚举名称服务器的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into Internet URIs. In this paper, we present a performance evaluation of ENUM name servers considering the new requirements and challenges imposed on traditional DNS servers with the incorporation of ENUM protocol. We defined three performance metrics for this performance evaluation: query throughput, response time, and CPU usage. Using a benchmarking testbed, we evaluated four name servers implementations (BIND, MyDNS-NG, NSD and PowerDNS) in different scenarios considering distinct size of database. Moreover, we improved the existing methodology for this kind of evaluation, since we identified the limitations of DNSPerf and proposed a new procedure for the evaluation. Results show that BIND and NSD servers achieved a high query throughput with great scalability features. On the other hand, PowerDNS server had a lower throughput and high sensibility to database size. MyDNS-NG server presented a quite low query throughput and poor scalability and, therefore, it is not suitable for ENUM purposes. These results bring to light a new reality for studies of ENUM servers, since they have not been evaluated in such a extended scenarios and size of the database.
机译:ENUM是一个用于将E.164电话号码映射到互联网URI的协议。在本文中,我们展示了枚举服务器的绩效评估,考虑到枚举协议的传统DNS服务器对传统DNS服务器施加的新要求和挑战。我们为此性能评估定义了三个性能指标:查询吞吐量,响应时间和CPU使用率。使用基准测试平台,我们在考虑不同的数据库大小的不同方案中评估了四个名称服务器实现(绑定,MyDNS-NG,NSD和PowerDNS)。此外,我们改进了这种评估的现有方法,因为我们确定了DNSPERF的局限性,并提出了评估的新程序。结果表明,BIND和NSD服务器实现了具有很大的可扩展性功能的高查询吞吐量。另一方面,PowerDNS服务器的吞吐量较低,对数据库大小的高度感性。 MyDNS-NG服务器呈现出相当低的查询吞吐量和可扩展性差,因此,它不适合枚举目的。这些结果为enum服务器的研究提供了一种新的现实,因为它们尚未在数据库的扩展方案和大小中进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号