【24h】

The challenge of convergence

机译:收敛的挑战

获取原文

摘要

There is a need for most facilitators to consolidate a great volume of ideas generated with Ventana's GroupSystems brainstorming tools. It is easy to generate ideas with great speed, but far less easy to bring them all together-a process called convergence. Traditional use of GroupSystems tools suggests that groups first brainstorm ideas using the Electronic Brainstorming (EB) tool, then organize these thoughts into categories using the Categorizer (CA) or Idea Organization (IO) tools, and finally they rank/order/vote the final categories to prioritize and achieve consensus. This paper presents an alternative sequence, in the context of what the author calls the group process: diverge (brainstorm or collect ideas); converge (consolidate, or make some sense of the ideas); evaluate (typically vote in some fashion); debate or lobby (to gain a better understanding), and finally organize the results (to develop presentable output).
机译:大多数促进者需要巩固与Ventana的团体系统集头脑风暴工具产生的大量想法。很容易以极快的速度生成想法,但远远不易把它们融合在一起 - 一个名为融合的过程。传统使用GroupSystems工具表明,组首先使用电子头脑风暴(EB)工具进行头脑风暴的想法,然后使用分类程序(CA)或Idea组织(IO)工具将这些思想组织成类别,最后他们排名/订单/投票优先考虑和实现共识的类别。本文提出了替代序列,在作者称之为组进程的背景下:分歧(头脑风暴或收集想法);汇合(巩固,或发出一些想法);评估(通常以某种方式投票);辩论或大厅(为了获得更好的理解),最后组织结果(开发出现的输出)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号