首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction >Paper Audit Trails and Voters' Privacy Concerns
【24h】

Paper Audit Trails and Voters' Privacy Concerns

机译:纸张审计跟踪和选民的隐私问题

获取原文

摘要

Advances in information technology have simplified many processes in our lives. However, in many cases trust issues arise when new technology is introduced, and voting is one prominent example. To increase voters' trust, current e-voting systems provide paper audit trails (PATs) which enable automatic tally and/or manual audit of the election result. PATs may contain only the encrypted vote or the plaintext vote in human-readable and/or machine-readable format. Previous studies report voter privacy concerns with PATs containing additional information (e.g. QR-Codes) other than the human-readable plaintext vote. However, omitting such PATs negatively influences security and/or efficiency. Hence, to address these concerns we applied the coping and threat appraisal principles of the protection motivation theory in the communication process. We evaluated them in separate surveys focused on the EasyVote system [15]. Results show that the coping appraisal is more promising than the threat appraisal approach. While our findings provide novel directions on addressing privacy concerns in the e-voting context, corresponding limitations need to be considered for future user studies.
机译:信息技术的进步已经简化了我们生活中的许多过程。但是,在许多情况下,在介绍新技术时出现了信任问题,并且投票是一个突出的例子。为了增加选民的信任,目前的电子投票系统提供纸张审计跟踪(PATS),其能够自动计数和/或手动审核选举结果。 PATS仅包含用于人类可读和/或机器可读格式的加密投票或明文投票。以前的研究报告了选民隐私问题与除人类可读明文投票之外的其他信息(例如QR-CODES)的拍卡申请。然而,省略这些申请对安全性和/或效率产生负面影响。因此,为了解决这些问题,我们在沟通过程中申请了保护动机理论的应对和威胁评估原则。我们在单独的调查中评估它们,专注于Easyvote系统[15]。结果表明,应对评估比威胁评估方法更具优惠。虽然我们的调查结果提供了关于在电子投票背景下解决隐私问题的新颖方向,但需要考虑对未来的用户学习的相应限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号