【24h】

Paper Audit Trails and Voters' Privacy Concerns

机译:纸质审计追踪和选民的隐私问题

获取原文

摘要

Advances in information technology have simplified many processes in our lives. However, in many cases trust issues arise when new technology is introduced, and voting is one prominent example. To increase voters' trust, current e-voting systems provide paper audit trails (PATs) which enable automatic tally and/or manual audit of the election result. PATs may contain only the encrypted vote or the plaintext vote in human-readable and/or machine-readable format. Previous studies report voter privacy concerns with PATs containing additional information (e.g. QR-Codes) other than the human-readable plaintext vote. However, omitting such PATs negatively influences security and/or efficiency. Hence, to address these concerns we applied the coping and threat appraisal principles of the protection motivation theory in the communication process. We evaluated them in separate surveys focused on the Easy Vote system . Results show that the coping appraisal is more promising than the threat appraisal approach. While our findings provide novel directions on addressing privacy concerns in the e-voting context, corresponding limitations need to be considered for future user studies.
机译:信息技术的进步简化了我们生活中的许多过程。但是,在许多情况下,引入新技术时就会出现信任问题,而投票就是一个突出的例子。为了增加选民的信任度,当前的电子投票系统提供了纸质审计追踪记录(PAT),可对选举结果进行自动计数和/或手动审计。 PAT可能仅包含人类可读和/或机器可读格式的加密投票或明文投票。先前的研究报告了投票人对隐私的关注,因为PATs包含了人类可读的明文投票以外的其他信息(例如QR码)。但是,省略此类PAT会对安全性和/或效率产生负面影响。因此,为了解决这些问题,我们在通信过程中应用了保护动机理论的应对和威胁评估原则。我们在针对Easy Vote系统的单独调查中对它们进行了评估。结果表明,应对评估比威胁评估方法更有希望。尽管我们的发现为解决电子投票环境中的隐私问题提供了新颖的指导,但未来的用户研究仍需要考虑相应的限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号