首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Nuclear Engineering >EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ABILITY OF RELAP5, DRAKO, FLOWMASTER2 AND PROGRAM USING UNSTEADY WALL FRICTION MODEL TO CALCULATE WATER HAMMER LOADINGS ON PIPELINES
【24h】

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ABILITY OF RELAP5, DRAKO, FLOWMASTER2 AND PROGRAM USING UNSTEADY WALL FRICTION MODEL TO CALCULATE WATER HAMMER LOADINGS ON PIPELINES

机译:使用非定常壁摩擦模型RETAP5,DRAKO,FlowMaster2和程序能力的实验评估,从而计算管道水锤载荷

获取原文

摘要

Mechanical loadings on pipe systems caused by water hammer (hydraulic transients) belong to the most important and most difficult to calculate design loadings in nuclear power plants. The most common procedure in Sweden is to calculate the water hammer loadings on pipe segments, according to the classical 1D theory of liquid transient flow in a pipeline, and then transfer the results to strength analyses of pipeline structure. This procedure assumes that there is quasi-steady respond of the pipeline structure to pressure surges - no dynamic interaction between the fluid and the pipeline construction. The hydraulic loadings are calculated with 1-D so-called "network" programs. Commonly used in Sweden are Relap5, Drako and Flowmaster2 - all using quasi-steady wall friction model. As a third party accredited inspection body INSPECTA NUCLEAR AB reviews calculations of water hammer loadings. The presented work shall be seen as an attempt to illustrate ability of Relap5, Flowmaster2 and Drako programs to calculate the water hammer loadings. A special attention was paid to using of Relap5 for calculation of water hammer pressure surges and forces (including some aspects of influence of Courant number on the calculation results) and also the importance of considering the dynamic (or unsteady) friction models. The calculations are compared with experimental results. The experiments have been conducted at a test rig designed and constructed at the Szewalski Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery of the Polish Academy of Sciences (IMP PAN) in Gdansk, Poland. The analyses show quite small differences between pressures and forces calculated with Relap5, Flowmaster2 and Drako (the differences regard mainly damping of pressure waves). The comparison of calculated and measured pressures and also a force acting on a pre-defined pipe segment show significant differences. It is shown that the differences can be reduced by using unsteady friction models in calculations. Recently, such models have been subjects of works of several researches in the world.
机译:由水锤(液压瞬变)引起的管道系统上的机械负载属于最重要,最难以计算核电站的设计装载。瑞典中最常见的过程是根据管道中的液态瞬态流动的经典1D理论计算管段上的水锤载荷,然后将结果转移到管道结构的强度分析。该过程假设管道结构对压力浪涌的准稳态响应 - 流体与管道结构之间没有动态相互作用。用1-D所谓的“网络”程序计算液压载荷。常用于瑞典的是Relap5,Drako和FlowMaster2 - 所有使用准稳态壁摩擦模型。作为第三方认可的检查身体核心AB评论水锤载荷的计算。所提出的工作应被视为试图说明Relap5,FlowMaster2和Drako程序计算水锤载荷的能力。使用Relap5的特别注意,用于计算水锤压力浪涌和力量(包括扶手数对计算结果的影响的某些方面)以及考虑动态(或不稳定)摩擦模型的重要性。将计算与实验结果进行比较。该实验已经在波兰科克斯克波兰科学院(Imp Pan)的Szewalski流体流体机械研究所设计和构建的试验室。分析显示用Relap5,FlowMaster2和Drako计算的压力和力之间的差异相当小(差异主要阻尼压力波)。计算和测量压力的比较以及作用在预定管段上的力显示出显着的差异。结果表明,通过在计算中使用不稳定的摩擦模型可以减少差异。最近,这些模型一直是世界上几项研究的作品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号