首页> 外文会议>IEEE Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities >Supporting Expert Close Analysis of Historical Scientific Writings: A Case Study for Near-by Reading
【24h】

Supporting Expert Close Analysis of Historical Scientific Writings: A Case Study for Near-by Reading

机译:支持历史科学着作的专家密切分析 - 以近读数为例

获取原文

摘要

Distant reading methodologies make use of computational processes to aid in the analysis of large text corpora which might not be pliable to traditional methods of scholarly analysis due to their volume. While these methods have been applied effectively to a variety of types of texts and contexts, they can leave unaddressed the needs of scholars in the humanities disciplines like history, who often engage in close reading of sources. Complementing the close analysis of texts with some of the tools of distant reading, such as visualization, can resolve some of the issues. We focus on a particular category of this intersection—which we refer to as near-by reading—wherein an expert engages in a computer-mediated analysis of a text with which they are familiar. We provide an example of this approach by developing a visual analysis application for the near-by reading of 19th-century scientific writings by J. W. von Goethe and A. P. de Candolle. We show that even the most formal and public texts, such as scientific treatises, can reveal unexpressed personal biases and philosophies that the authors themselves might not have recognized.
机译:遥远的阅读方法利用计算过程来帮助分析大型文本语料库,这可能不会因其体积而无法与传统的学术分析方法造成贸易。虽然这些方法已经有效地应用于各种类型的文本和背景,但他们可以毫无压力地留下人文学科等学者的需求,历史,他们经常从事近距离阅读来源。补充文本与一些遥远读数的文本的密切分析,例如可视化,可以解决一些问题。我们专注于这种交叉路口的特定类别 - 我们指的是近读数 - 其中专家参与计算机介导的文本分析,他们熟悉的文字。我们通过开发近乎读取的近读数来提供这种方法的示例 th - J. W.Von Goethe和A. P. de Candolle的Centryury Scientific。我们表明即使是最正式和最正规和公共文本,如科学论文,也可以揭示提交人本身可能没有认可的不表达的个人偏见和哲学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号